Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34042005›Full record

ArticleInternational biomechanics2019

Gait alteration strategies for knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of joint loading via generic and patient-specific musculoskeletal model scaling techniques.

C M Dzialo, M Mannisi, K S Halonen, M de Zee, J Woodburn, M S Andersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International biomechanics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Reduced Muscle Strength Can Alter the Impact of Gait Modifications on Knee Cartilage Mechanics.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C M DzialoAnybody Technology A/S, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8097-3667
M MannisiSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK.
K S HalonenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
M de ZeeDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
J WoodburnSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK.
M S AndersenAnybody Technology A/S, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8275-9472
Aalborg University · DKAnyBody Technology (Denmark) · DKGlasgow Caledonian University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait modifications and laterally wedged insoles are non-invasive approaches used to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. However, the outcome of these alterations is still a controversial topic. This study investigates how gait alteration techniques may have a unique effect on individual patients; and furthermore, the way we scale our musculoskeletal models to estimate the medial joint contact force may influence knee loading conditions. Five patients with clinical evidence of medial knee osteoarthritis were asked to walk at a normal walking speed over force plates and simultaneously 3D motion was captured during seven conditions (0°-, 5°-, 10°-insoles, shod, toe-in, toe-out, and wide stance). We developed patient-specific musculoskeletal models, using segmentations from magnetic resonance imaging to morph a generic model to patient-specific bone geometries and applied this morphing to estimate muscle insertion sites. Additionally, models were created of these patients using a simple linear scaling method. When examining the patients' medial compartment contact force (peak and impulse) during stance phase, a 'one-size-fits-all' gait alteration aimed to reduce medial knee loading did not exist. Moreover, the different scaling methods lead to differences in medial contact forces; highlighting the importance of further investigation of musculoskeletal modeling methods prior to use in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Gait modificationsknee contact forcelateral insolesmagnetic resonance imagingmedial compartment knee osteoarthritismorphingmusculoskeletal modelscaling

Identifiers

PMID34042005
PMCPMC7857308
OpenAlexW2963463254

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.