Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34049749›Full record

SynthesisClinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)2022

Impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on body weight: A combined systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Dimitra Rafailia Bakaloudi, Rocco Barazzoni, Stephan C Bischoff, Joao Breda, Kremlin Wickramasinghe, Michail Chourdakis

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The Impact of Lockdowns on Caffeine Consumption: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dimitra Rafailia BakaloudiLaboratory of Hygiene, Social & Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Electronic address: dmpakalo@auth.gr.
Rocco BarazzoniDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. Electronic address: barazzon@units.it.
Stephan C BischoffUniversity of Hohenheim, Department of Nutritional Medicine, Stuttgart, Germany. Electronic address: bischoff.stephan@uni-hohenheim.de.
Joao BredaDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Russian Federation. Electronic address: rodriguesdasilvabred@who.int.
Kremlin WickramasingheWHO European Office for the Prevention and Control of NCDs, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Moscow, Russian Federation. Electronic address: wickramasinghek@who.int.
Michail ChourdakisLaboratory of Hygiene, Social & Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Electronic address: mhourd@gapps.auth.gr.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the imposed lockdowns in order to control the pandemic, had undoubtedly influenced the lifestyle of millions of people worldwide. The period of confinement, which was characterized by seizing most business activities and allowing only for e-classes at schools and universities, leading also to a lower physical activity, could have affected eating behaviors of people of all ages. In this study we aimed to investigate the impact of the first lockdown period (March-May 2020) on body weight (BW) and on body mass index (BMI) in both adults and adolescents (>16 years old). A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed®, Scopus®, Web of Science® and EMBASE® databases and 36 observational (35 cross-sectional and one cohort) studies were included. BW and BMI changes after/during the lockdown period were examined. BW was stated as increased in a significant part of the individuals (11.1-72.4%), although a range of 7.2-51.4% of individuals reported weight loss. A significant higher BW was observed with a weighted mean between-group difference (WMD) 1.57 (95% CI 1.01 to 2.14) in the post-lockdown period compared to the before lockdown time and higher BMI, 0.31 WMD (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.45) was identified before the lockdown period. At variance with general trends, one study in older adults (>60 years old) notably reported a significant BW loss, suggesting a higher risk for lockdown-induced weight loss and potentially malnutrition in the elderly population. Overall increments in BW are an alarming effect of lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to potential higher incidence of overweight, obesity and related health-risks as well as other noncommunicable diseases. Further studies are needed to assess potential group-specific impacts, with particular regard to weight gain in younger people and risk of weight loss, malnutrition and sarcopenia in older adults.

Indexed as

COVID-19MalnutritionAdolescentAgedCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedObesityOverweightPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Weight LossBMICOVID-19Sars-Cov-2Weight changeWeight gainWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID34049749
PMCPMC8056819

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.