Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34051728›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Implementation of a performance-based financing scheme in Malawi and resulting externalities on the quality of care of non-incentivized services.

Stephan Brenner, Caterina Favaretti, Julia Lohmann, Jobiba Chinkhumba, Adamson S Muula, Manuela De Allegri

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephan Brenner *Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, INF 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. stephan.brenner@uni-heidelberg.de.
Caterina Favaretti *Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, INF 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Julia LohmannHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, INF 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jobiba ChinkhumbaDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, Health Economics and Policy Unit, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Adamson S MuulaSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine and ACEPHEM, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
Manuela De AllegriHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital and Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, INF 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Malawi · MWUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCountries in Africa progressively implement performance-based financing schemes to improve the quality of care provided by maternal, newborn and child health services. Beyond its direct effects on service provision, evidence suggests that performance-based financing can also generate positive externalities on service utilization, such as increased use of those services that reached higher quality standards after effective scheme implementation. Little, however, is known about externalities generated within non-incentivized health services, such as positive or negative effects on the quality of services within the continuum of maternal care.

methodsWe explored whether a performance-based financing scheme in Malawi designed to improve the quality of childbirth service provision resulted positive or negative externalities on the quality of non-targeted antenatal care provision. This non-randomized controlled pre-post-test study followed the phased enrolment of facilities into a performance-based financing scheme across four districts over a two-year period. Effects of the scheme were assessed by various composite scores measuring facilities' readiness to provide quality antenatal care, as well as the quality of screening, prevention, and education processes offered during observed antenatal care consultations.

resultsOur study did not identify any statistically significant effects on the quality of ANC provision attributable to the implemented performance-based financing scheme. Our findings therefore suggest not only the absence of positive externalities, but also the absence of any negative externalities generated within antenatal care service provision as a result of the scheme implementation in Malawi.

conclusionsPrior research has shown that the Malawian performance-based financing scheme was sufficiently effective to improve the quality of incentivized childbirth service provision. Our findings further indicate that scheme implementation did not affect the quality of non-incentivized but clinically related antenatal care services. While no positive externalities could be identified, we also did not observe any negative externalities attributable to the scheme's implementation. While performance-based incentives might be successful in improving targeted health care processes, they have limited potential in producing externalities - neither positive nor negative - on the provision quality of related non-incentivized services.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementReimbursement, IncentiveFemaleHumansMalawiMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyAntenatal careExternalitiesPerformance-based financingQuality of careStepped implementation

Identifiers

PMID34051728
PMCPMC8164300
OpenAlexW3165457599

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.