Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34052584›Full record

SynthesisJournal of affective disorders2021

Government response moderates the mental health impact of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of depression outcomes across countries.

Yena Lee, Leanna M W Lui, David Chen-Li, Yuhua Liao, Rodrigo B Mansur, Elisa Brietzke, Joshua D Rosenblat, Roger Ho, Nelson B Rodrigues, Orly Lipsitz and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of affective disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
31.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The next viral pandemic-where do we stand?Folia microbiologica · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yena LeeMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A8. Electronic address: yenalee.lee@utoronto.ca.
Leanna M W LuiMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8.
David Chen-LiMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8.
Yuhua LiaoDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; Department of Psychiatry, Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Rodrigo B MansurMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A8.
Elisa BrietzkeDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University School of Medicine, Kingston, ON, Canada; Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Joshua D RosenblatMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A8.
Roger HoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Nelson B RodriguesMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8.
Orly LipsitzMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8.
Flora NasriMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8.
Bing CaoKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Faculty of Psychology, Ministry of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, People's Republic of China.
Mehala SubramaniapillaiMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8.
Hartej GillMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8.
Ciyong LuDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Roger S McIntyreMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A8; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A8; Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A8.
University Health Network · CASun Yat-sen University · CNNational University of Singapore · SGQueen's University · CASouthwest University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic represents a public health, economic and mental health crisis. We hypothesized that timely government implementation of stringent measures to reduce viral transmission would benefit mental health, as evidenced by reduced rates of depressive symptoms (i.e., Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ]-9≥10, PHQ-2≥3).

methodsThe systematic review herein (PROSPERO CRD42020200647) evaluated to what extent differences in government-imposed stringency and timeliness of response to COVID-19 moderate the prevalence of depressive symptoms across 33 countries (k=114, N=640,037). We included data from six lower-middle-income countries, nine upper-middle-income countries, and 18 higher-income countries. Government-imposed stringency and timeliness in response were operationalized using the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response ("Stringency") Index.

resultsThe overall proportion of study participants with clinically significant depressive symptoms was 21.39% (95% CI 19.37-23.47). The prevalence of clinically significant depressive symptoms was significantly lower in countries wherein governments implemented stringent policies promptly. The moderating effect of government response remained significant after including the national frequency of COVID cases at the time of study commencement, Healthcare Access and Quality index, and the inclusion of COVID patients in the study. LIMITATIONS: Factors that may have confounded our results include, for example, differences in lockdown duration, lack of study participant and outcome assessor blinding, and retrospective assessment of depressive symptom severity.

conclusionsGovernments that enacted stringent measures to contain the spread of COVID-19 benefited not only the physical, but also the mental health of their population.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCommunicable Disease ControlDepressionGovernmentHumansMental HealthRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19DepressionDepressive DisorderPandemicPublic Healthsevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID34052584
PMCPMC8159271
OpenAlexW3164080502

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.