Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34060719›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2021

The precise magic of CRISPR.

Alexander Kondrashov

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alexander KondrashovDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, UK.
Sunny BioDiscovery (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this issue of FEBS Open Bio, Shen Li et al., in the laboratory of Hector L. Franco (University of North Carolina), provide a proof-of-principle solution for correcting all copies of a gene in the widely used MCF7 breast cancer cell line. The gene for the FOXA1 pioneer transcription factor is localised on chromosome 14, which is present at least 4-5 times in MCF7 cells. To achieve their goal, the authors used a 'classical' version of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Both sgRNA and Cas9 components were expressed from a single vector, which also has a puromycin resistance cassette; this is an essential module for the chosen strategy, because it ensures expression of both sgRNA and Cas9 in selected cells. A targeting template in the form of nonlinearised plasmid was shown to have the best efficiency and was used to introduce a substitution at position 295 in the gene encoding FOXA1 to change a codon encoding lysine into a codon encoding glutamine (K295Q). The strategy suggested by Li and co-authors is an important development towards genome editing of multiple copy genes in a polyploid environment like cancer cells. One important application of the technique could be in creating models to study the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms in cancer progression and metastasis. Isogenic cancer lines carrying polymorphic variants of key drug targets could be used to optimise anticancer treatment protocols, laying a foundation for personalised therapy.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingPlasmidscancerCRISPR/Cas9genome editingpolyploid cells

Identifiers

PMID34060719
PMCPMC8167870
OpenAlexW3164842357

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.