Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34060934›Full record

Trial reportNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2021

Effects of Combined and Alone Transcranial Motor Cortex Stimulation and Mirror Therapy in Phantom Limb Pain: A Randomized Factorial Trial.

Muhammed Enes Gunduz, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Camila Bonin Pinto, Dante Duarte, Faddi Ghassan Saleh Vélez, Anna Carolyna Lepesteur Gianlorenco, Paulo Eduardo Portes Teixeira, Stefano Giannoni-Luza, David Crandell, Linamara Rizzo Battistella and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phantom Limb Pain Management.The Journal of hand surgery · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Motor cortex stimulation for phantom limb pain treatment.Surgical neurology international · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Muhammed Enes GunduzSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kevin Pacheco-BarriosSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Camila Bonin PintoSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2820-8703
Dante DuarteSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-5473
Faddi Ghassan Saleh VélezSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Anna Carolyna Lepesteur GianlorencoSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Paulo Eduardo Portes TeixeiraSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Stefano Giannoni-LuzaSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
David CrandellSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Linamara Rizzo BattistellaUniversity of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-0733
Marcel SimisUniversity of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe FregniSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1307-9355
Harvard University · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Pragmatic Trial of Remote tDCS and Somatosensory Training for Phantom Limb Pain with Machine Learning to Predict Treatment ResponseR01HD082302 · NICHD · SPAULDING REHABILITATION HOSPITAL · PI Felipe Fregni · 2015 to 2026
$4.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent complication in amputees, which is often refractory to treatments. We aim to assess in a factorial trial the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mirror therapy (MT) in patients with traumatic lower limb amputation; and whether the motor cortex plasticity changes drive these results. In this large randomized, blinded, 2-site, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial, 112 participants with traumatic lower limb amputation were randomized into treatment groups. The interventions were active or covered MT for 4 weeks (20 sessions, 15 minutes each) combined with 2 weeks of either active or sham tDCS (10 sessions, 20 minutes each) applied to the contralateral primary motor cortex. The primary outcome was PLP changes on the visual analogue scale at the end of interventions (4 weeks). Motor cortex excitability and cortical mapping were assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We found no interaction between tDCS and MT groups (

Indexed as

AdultCombined Modality TherapyDouble-Blind MethodEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMirror Movement TherapyMotor CortexPhantom LimbTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultmirror therapymotor cortexphantom limb paintranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34060934
PMCPMC10042175
OpenAlexW3163966173

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.