ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021
Factors Associated with Mutations: Their Matching Rates to Cardiovascular and Neurological Diseases.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- NFκB1: a common biomarker linking Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease pathology.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Decoding the genetic blueprints of neurological disorders: disease mechanisms and breakthrough gene therapies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Reduced GLP-1R availability in the caudate nucleus with Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- X-linked hydrocephalus genes: Their proximity to telomeres and high A + T content compared to Parkinson's disease.Experimental neurology · 2023Review
- Mutability of druggable kinases and pro-inflammatory cytokines by their proximity to telomeres and A+T content.PloS one · 2023Article
- Activation Mechanism of RhoA Caused by Constitutively Activating Mutations G14V and Q63L.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Drug-Targeted Genomes: Mutability of Ion Channels and GPCRs.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- TRPV4 mRNA is elevated in the caudate nucleus with NPH but not in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Monogenic hypertension is rare and caused by genetic mutations, but whether factors associated with mutations are disease-specific remains uncertain. Given two factors associated with high mutation rates, we tested how many previously known genes match with (i) proximity to telomeres or (ii) high adenine and thymine content in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) related to vascular stiffening. We extracted genomic information using a genome data viewer. In human chromosomes, 64 of 79 genetic loci involving >25 rare mutations and single nucleotide polymorphisms satisfied (i) or (ii), resulting in an 81% matching rate. However, this high matching rate was no longer observed as we checked the two factors in genes associated with essential hypertension (EH), thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA), and congenital heart disease (CHD), resulting in matching rates of 53%, 70%, and 75%, respectively. A matching of telomere proximity or high adenine and thymine content projects the list of loci involving rare mutations of monogenic hypertension better than those of other CVDs, likely due to adoption of rigorous criteria for true-positive signals. Our data suggest that the factor-disease matching rate is an accurate tool that can explain deleterious mutations of monogenic hypertension at a >80% match-unlike the relatively lower matching rates found in human genes of EH, TAA, CHD, and familial Parkinson's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.