Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34065346›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Recent Progress in Dendritic Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy.

Kazuhiko Matsuo, Osamu Yoshie, Kosuke Kitahata, Momo Kamei, Yuta Hara, Takashi Nakayama

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Natural and Engineered Cytokines as Cancer Therapeutics.Annual review of cancer biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Lignin-Based Nanocarrier for Simultaneous Delivery ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Human CD34Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuhiko MatsuoDivision of Chemotherapy, Kindai University Faculty of Pharmacy, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan.
Osamu YoshieKindai University, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashi-Osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4353-5809
Kosuke KitahataDivision of Chemotherapy, Kindai University Faculty of Pharmacy, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan.
Momo KameiDivision of Chemotherapy, Kindai University Faculty of Pharmacy, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan.
Yuta HaraDivision of Chemotherapy, Kindai University Faculty of Pharmacy, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan.
Takashi NakayamaDivision of Chemotherapy, Kindai University Faculty of Pharmacy, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan.
Kindai University · JPKoriyama Institute of Health Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy aims to treat cancer by enhancing cancer-specific host immune responses. Recently, cancer immunotherapy has been attracting much attention because of the successful clinical application of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways. However, although highly effective in some patients, immune checkpoint inhibitors are beneficial only in a limited fraction of patients, possibly because of the lack of enough cancer-specific immune cells, especially CD8

Indexed as

adjuvantcancer vaccinechemokinecytotoxic T-lymphocytedendritic cellsXCL1XCR1

Identifiers

PMID34065346
PMCPMC8161242
OpenAlexW3162648617

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.