Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34069573›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Bioassay Development for Bispecific Antibodies-Challenges and Opportunities.

Ames C Register, Somayeh S Tarighat, Ho Young Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development ofMolecular therapy. Advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Recent Advances in Antibody Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ames C RegisterBiological Technologies, Department of Analytical Development and Quality Control, Genentech-A Member of the Roche Group, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Somayeh S TarighatCell Therapy Analytical Development, Department of Cell Therapy Engineering and Development, Genentech-A Member of the Roche Group, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Ho Young LeeCell Therapy Analytical Development, Department of Cell Therapy Engineering and Development, Genentech-A Member of the Roche Group, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
La Roche College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody therapeutics are expanding with promising clinical outcomes, and diverse formats of antibodies are further developed and available for patients of the most challenging disease areas. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have several significant advantages over monospecific antibodies by engaging two antigen targets. Due to the complicated mechanism of action, diverse structural variations, and dual-target binding, developing bioassays and other types of assays to characterize BsAbs is challenging. Developing bioassays for BsAbs requires a good understanding of the mechanism of action of the molecule, principles and applications of different bioanalytical methods, and phase-appropriate considerations per regulatory guidelines. Here, we review recent advances and case studies to provide strategies and insights for bioassay development for different types of bispecific molecules.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BispecificAntigensBiological AssayHumansImmunotherapyAntibodies, BispecificAntigensbinding assaysbioassaysbispecific antibodiesmechanisms of actionpotency assays

Identifiers

PMID34069573
PMCPMC8160952
OpenAlexW3162319825

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.