Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34073702›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

High-Throughput Sequencing of Phage Display Libraries Reveals Parasitic Enrichment of Indel Mutants Caused by Amplification Bias.

Sander Plessers, Vincent Van Deuren, Rob Lavigne, Johan Robben

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sander PlessersDepartment of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200G, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2148-1395
Vincent Van DeurenDepartment of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200G, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0850-5030
Rob LavigneDepartment of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 21, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Johan RobbenDepartment of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200G, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 11B2319NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1S80719NKU Leuven GOA/15/006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of phage display technology with high-throughput sequencing enables in-depth analysis of library diversity and selection-driven dynamics. We applied short-read sequencing of the mutagenized region on focused display libraries of two homologous nucleic acid modification eraser proteins-AlkB and FTO-biopanned against methylated DNA. This revealed enriched genotypes with small indels and concomitant doubtful amino acid motifs within the FTO library. Nanopore sequencing of the entire display vector showed additional enrichment of large deletions overlooked by region-specific sequencing, and further impacted the interpretation of the obtained amino acid motifs. We could attribute enrichment of these corrupted clones to amplification bias due to arduous FTO display slowing down host cell growth as well as phage production. This amplification bias appeared to be stronger than affinity-based target selection. Recommendations are provided for proper sequence analysis of phage display data, which can improve motive discovery in libraries of proteins that are difficult to display.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPeptide LibraryBacteriophagesINDEL MutationSequence Analysis, DNAPeptide LibraryAlkBamplification biasFTOIllumina sequencingOxford nanopore sequencingparasitic enrichmentphage display

Identifiers

PMID34073702
PMCPMC8197208
OpenAlexW3165677348

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.