Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34073977›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy between Preserved and Preservative-Free Latanoprost and Preservative-Free Tafluprost.

Joon Mo Kim, Sang Woo Park, Mincheol Seong, Seung Joo Ha, Ji Woong Lee, Seungsoo Rho, Chong Eun Lee, Kyoung Nam Kim, Tae-Woo Kim, Kyung Rim Sung and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Joon Mo KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29 Saemunan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03181, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4543-043X
Sang Woo ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, 42 Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61469, Korea.
Mincheol SeongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Kyougchun-ro 153, Guri-si 11923, Korea.
Seung Joo HaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04401, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4060-3423
Ji Woong LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan 49241, Korea.
Seungsoo RhoDepartment of Ophthalmology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea.
Chong Eun LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu 42601, Korea.
Kyoung Nam KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon 35015, Korea.
Tae-Woo KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Korea.
Kyung Rim SungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Chan Yun KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8373-9999
CHA University Bundang Medical Center · KRChonnam National University Hospital · KRChungnam National University · KRHanyang University Guri Hospital · KRKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KRKeimyung University · KRPusan National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul · KRUlsan College · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

Taejoon Pharmacetual Company TJO-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effect of preservative-free (PF) 0.0015% tafluprost (TA), to the preservative containing (PC) and the PF 0.005% latanoprost (LA) in Korean subjects. This study was conducted as a multi-center, randomized, investigator-blind, active controlled, parallel-group, clinical trial in adult patients (≥19 years) with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). After a washout period, patients with an IOP between 15 and 35 mmHg were enrolled and evaluated the efficacy, safety, and compliance at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after the first administration. A total of 137 OAG and OHT patients were randomized. Statistically significant reductions in IOP were observed in all groups. Twelve weeks after each eye drop instillation, the mean IOP reduction was -4.59 ± 2.70 mmHg (-24.57 ± 13.49%) in the PC-LA group, -4.52 ± 2.17 mmHg (-24.41 ± 11.38%) in the PF-LA, and -3.14 ± 2.83 mmHg (-17.22 ± 14.57%) in the PF-TA group. The PF-LA showed significantly better responsiveness than did PF-TA. PF-LA was better tolerated than was PC-LA. There were no adverse events that led to cessation of eye drop use in any of the groups. In conclusion, IOP decreased similarly across the groups. PF-LA may provide a good choice for OAG patients with ocular surface diseases.

Indexed as

dry eyeglaucomaintraocular pressurelatanoprostocular surface discomfortprostaglandin analoguetafluprost

Identifiers

PMID34073977
PMCPMC8225154
OpenAlexW3164877357

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.