Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34079726›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

Low dose contrast media in step-and-shoot coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source computed tomography: feasibility of using 30 mL of contrast media in patients with body surface area <1.7 m

Liang Jin, Bing Jie, Yiyi Gao, An'qi Jiang, Tingwen Weng, Ming Li

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liang JinRadiology Department, Huadong Hospital, affiliated with Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bing JieRadiology Department, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Affiliated with Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Yiyi GaoRadiology Department, Huadong Hospital, affiliated with Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
An'qi JiangRadiology Department, Huadong Hospital, affiliated with Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tingwen WengCardiology Department, Huadong Hospital, Affiliated with Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ming LiRadiology Department, Huadong Hospital, affiliated with Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University · CNHuadong Hospital · CNShanghai Pulmonary Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReducing contrast media volume in coronary computed tomography angiography minimizes the risk of adverse events but may compromise diagnostic image quality. We aimed to evaluate coronary computed tomography angiography's diagnostic image quality while using 30 mL of contrast media in patients with a body surface area <1.7 m

methodsThis prospective study included patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography from May 2018 to June 2019. The patients were divided into a low-dose group, who received 30 mL of contrast media, and a routine-dose group, who received contrast media based on body weight. Patient characteristics, coronary computed tomography angiography results, and quantitative and qualitative image results were assessed and compared.

resultsIn total, 103 patients with a body surface area <1.7 m

conclusionsUsing 30 mL of contrast media for coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with a body surface area <1.7 m

Indexed as

body surface areacomputed tomography angiographyContrast mediacoronary angiographycoronary artery disease

Identifiers

PMID34079726
PMCPMC8107323
OpenAlexW3153315901

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.