Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34093076›Full record

ReviewNotfall & rettungsmedizin2021

[Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions].

Spyros D Mentzelopoulos, Keith Couper, Patrick Van de Voorde, Patrick Druwé, Marieke Blom, Gavin D Perkins, Ileana Lulic, Jana Djakow, Violetta Raffay, Gisela Lilja and 1 more

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Notfall & rettungsmedizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. [Executive summary].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
  5. [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Spyros D MentzelopoulosEvaggelismos Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Abteilung für Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät der Nationalen und Kapodistrischen Universität Athen, 45-47 Ipsilandou Street, 10675 Athen, Griechenland.
Keith CouperUniversitätskliniken Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK Critical Care Unit, Birmingham, Großbritannien.
Patrick Van de VoordeUniversitätsklinikum und Universität Gent, Gent, Belgien.
Patrick DruwéAbteilung für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Gent, Gent, Belgien.
Marieke BlomMedizinisches Zentrum der Universität Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Niederlande.
Gavin D PerkinsMedizinische Fakultät Warwick, Universität Warwick, Coventry, Großbritannien.
Ileana LulicKlinisches Krankenhaus Merkur, Zagreb, Kroatien.
Jana DjakowIntensivstation für Kinder, NH Hospital, Hořovice, Tschechien.
Violetta RaffaySchool of Medicine, Europäische Universität Zypern, Nikosia, Zypern.
Gisela LiljaUniversitätsklinikum Skane, Abteilung für klinische Wissenschaften Lund, Neurologie, Universität Lund, Lund, Schweden.
Leo BossaertUniversität Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgien.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

These European Resuscitation Council Ethics guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the ethical, routine practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care of adults and children. The guideline primarily focus on major ethical practice interventions (i.e. advance directives, advance care planning, and shared decision making), decision making regarding resuscitation, education, and research. These areas are tightly related to the application of the principles of bioethics in the practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care.

Indexed as

Advance care planingAdvance directivesShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID34093076
PMCPMC8170633

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.