ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2021
Trends in treatments for prostate cancer in the United States, 2010-2015.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Toxicity of Whole Pelvic Radiotherapy Versus Prostate-Only Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Outcomes of Salvage Proton Therapy After Primary Cryosurgery or High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Recurrent Localized Prostate Cancer.International journal of particle therapy · 2026Article
- Qualitative thematic analysis of online forum discussions on post-radiation prostate cancer survivorship.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of MRI-derived features for biochemical recurrence after curative radiotherapy in prostate cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Decision regret after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asian journal of urology · 2026Review
- Prognostic value of central gland volume on MRI for biochemical recurrence after prostate radiotherapy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Economic Evaluation of a Novel MicroRNA-Based Assay to Determine Risk of Late Genitourinary Radiation Toxicity in Patients With Prostate Cancer.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2025Article
- Management of functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy in the Nordic countries: A survey of uro-oncological centers.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- Prostate cancer treatment in Portugal: a nationwide analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin suppresses growth and enhances prostate cancer response to radiotherapy.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Clinical characteristics of secondary bladder cancer developing after low-/high-dose-rate brachytherapy to treat localized prostate cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Improving the Post-Operative Prediction of BCR-Free Survival Time with mRNA Variables and Machine Learning.Cancers · 2023Article
- Quantifying Radiosensitization of PSMA-Targeted Gold Nanoparticles on Prostate Cancer Cells at Megavoltage Radiation Energies by Monte Carlo Simulation and Local Effect Model.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Assessing volatile organic compounds exposure and prostate-specific antigen: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2010.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- The Impact of Metabolic Syndrome and Type 2 DiabetesFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Multivariable-adjusted trends in mortality due to alcoholic liver disease among adults in the United States, from 1999-2017.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although annual mortality trends for prostate cancer were stabilized in recent years, understanding the exact treatment changes is necessary for optimal management. Utilization of not-otherwise specified (NOS) treatments for prostate cancer was unclear. Thus, this study aimed to analyze trends in treatment for prostate cancer in the U.S. from 2010 to 2015 and examine whether the treatment for the prostate cancer in the U.S. is compliant with clinical practice guidelines. Using joinpoint regression models, we examined trends in the rate and proportion of age-standardized utilization (ASUR and ASUP) of treatments for prostate cancer diagnosed during 2010-2015 in the U.S. based on the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, 2018 data-release, with linkage to active surveillance/watchful waiting [AS/WW]) cancer registry program. Among 316,690 men with prostate cancer diagnosed during 2010-2015, ASUR and ASUP for radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, AS/WW and NOS treatment were 32.7, 34.4, 10.0 and 40.1 per 100,000, and 27.9%, 29.3%, 8.5% and 34.2%, respectively. Trends in the overall ASUR for prostate cancer treatments differed by cancer risk group, patients' age, race/ethnicity, Gleason score, insurance status, and the average education level, average poverty-level and foreign-born person percentage of the patient's residence-county, but not by rural-urban continuum or region. ASUP of radical prostatectomy decreased from 9.8% in 2010 to 4.8% in 2015 (annual percent change [APC] = -12.0%, 95% CI, -15.9 to -7.9%), and the decrease was observed in all different risk groups. ASUP of AS/WW increased from 16.4% in 2010 to 30.2% in 2013 (APC = 22.7%, 95% CI, 4.6 to 44.0%) and then remained stable through 2013 to 2015 (APC = 1.9%, 95% CI, -24.1 to 36.9%). The increasing tendency of AS/WW only occurred in the low-risk and intermediate-risk groups. The ASUP of NOS treatment has increased from 32.3% in 2010 to 36.8% in 2015 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
34094691PMC8167696W3166166721What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.