ArticleCardiovascular drugs and therapy2022
Switching, Persistence and Adherence to Statin Therapy: a Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Australian National Pharmacy Data.
Article in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Statin Floor Effect: a Mechanistic Framework for Residual Cardiovascular Risk.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Drug class duplication patterns among South African middle-aged adults: findings from a medicine claims database.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Pharmacoepidemiology unpacked: a roadmap for junior researchers.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Medication persistence trajectories among individuals prescribed lipid-lowering therapy in primary care settings: A retrospective cohort study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Newly Started Versus Previously Treated Statin Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Adherence and Persistence with Reference to Cardiovascular Prevention.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use When Indicated and Subsequent Ischemic Stroke Severity.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Article
- Do clinical decision support tools improve quality of care outcomes in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
- Lipid-Lowering Strategies for Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in the UK: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Statins use amidst the pandemic: prescribing, dispensing, adherence, persistence, and correlation with COVID-19 statistics in nationwide real-world data from Poland.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Age and sex specific thresholds for risk stratification of cardiovascular disease and clinical decision making: prospective open cohort study.BMJ medicine · 2024Article
- Combined population genomic screening for three high-risk conditions in Australia: a modelling study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Persistence and Adherence to Cardiovascular Medicines in Australia.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Challenges in Improving Adherence to Diet and Drug Treatment in Hypercholesterolemia Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Statins and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Low to Moderate Risk but With Non-obstructive Carotid Plaques: The SCOPE-CP Study.Korean circulation journal · 2022Article
- Gaps and discontinuation of statin treatment in Norway: potential for optimizing management of lipid lowering drugs.European heart journal open · 2022Article
- Patient-Reported Reasons for Switching or Discontinuing Statin Therapy: A Mixed Methods Study Using Social Media.Drug safety · 2022Article
- Statin Prescription Patterns and Associations with Subclinical Inflammation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Comparison of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Goal Achievement and Lipid-Lowering Therapy in the Patients With Coronary Artery Disease With Different Renal Functions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Direct Healthcare Costs by Level of Adherence of a Real-World Population of Statin Users in Italy.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStatins are widely prescribed for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but their effectiveness is dependent on the level of adherence and persistence.
objectivesThis study aimed to explore the patterns of switching, adherence and persistence among the Australian general population with newly dispensed statins.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using a random sample of data from the Australian national prescription claims data. Switching, adherence to and persistence with statins were assessed for people starting statins from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. Switching was defined as either switching to another intensity of statin, to another statin or to a non-statin agent. Non-persistence to treatment was defined as discontinuation (i.e. ≥90 days with no statin) of coverage. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC), and patients with PDC < 0.80 were considered non-adherent. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare discontinuation, switching and reinitiation between different statins.
resultsA cohort of 141,062 people dispensed statins and followed over a median duration of 2.5 years were included. Of the cohort, 29.3% switched statin intensity, 28.4% switched statin type, 3.7% switched to ezetimibe and in 2.7%, ezetimibe was added as combination therapy during the study period. Overall, 58.8% discontinued statins based on the 90-day gap criteria, of whom 55.2% restarted. The proportion of people non-adherent was 24.0% at 6 months to 49.0% at 5 years. People on low and moderate intensity statins were more likely to discontinue compared to those on high-intensity statins (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.31), (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.14-1.42), respectively. Compared to maintaining same statin type and intensity, switching statins, which includes up-titration (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.86) was associated with less likelihood of discontinuation after reinitiation.
conclusionsLong-term persistence and adherence to statins remains generally poor among Australians, which limits the effectiveness of these medicines and the consequent health impact they may provide for individuals (and by extension, the population impact when poor persistence and adherence is considered in the statin-taking population). Switching between statins is prevalent in one third of statin users, although any clinical benefit of the observed switching trend is unknown. This, combined with the high volume of statin prescriptions, highlights the need for better strategies to address poor persistence and adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.