ArticleStroke2021
Thomas Willis Lecture: Targeting Brain Arterioles for Acute Stroke Treatment.
Article in Stroke, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exosomes in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy of ischemic stroke.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- A randomized trial of Trendelenburg position for acute moderate ischemic stroke.Nature communications · 2023Trial
- Loss of Vascular TMEM16A Impairs Cerebral Autoregulation and Exacerbates Ischemia-reperfusion Injury.Translational stroke research · 2026Article
- Trendelenburg position for acute anterior circulation ischaemic stroke with large artery atherosclerosis aetiology (HOPES 3): rationale and design.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2024Article
- CaCommunications biology · 2024Article
- Prediction of collateral circulation grading and functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke using FLAIR vascular hyperintensity combined with multimodal CT parameters.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral infarction or ischemic death of brain tissue, most notably neurons, is a primary response to vascular occlusion that if minimized leads to better stroke outcome. However, many cell types are affected in the brain during ischemia and reperfusion, including vascular cells of the cerebral circulation. Importantly, the structure and function of all brain vascular segments are major determinants of the depth of ischemia during the occlusion, the extent of collateral flow (and therefore amount of potentially salvageable tissue) and the degree of reperfusion. Thus, appropriate function of the cerebral circulation can influence stroke outcome. The brain vasculature is also directly involved in secondary injury to ischemia, including edema, hemorrhage, and infarct expansion, and provides a key delivery route for neuroprotective agents. Therefore, the cerebral circulation provides a therapeutic target for multiple aspects of stroke injury, including aiding neuroprotection. Understanding how ischemia and reperfusion affect the brain vasculature is key to this therapeutic potential, that is, vascular protection. This report is focused on regional differences in the cerebral circulation, how ischemia and reperfusion differentially affects these segments, and how the response of large versus small vessels in the brain to ischemia and reperfusion can influence stroke outcome. Last, how chronic hypertension, a common comorbidity in patients with stroke, affects the brain microvasculature to worsen stroke outcome will be described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.