Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34112180›Full record

Trial reportJournal of translational medicine2021

Radiomic signature of the FOWARC trial predicts pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer.

Zhuokai Zhuang, Zongchao Liu, Juan Li, Xiaolin Wang, Peiyi Xie, Fei Xiong, Jiancong Hu, Xiaochun Meng, Meijin Huang, Yanhong Deng and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhuokai Zhuang *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1784-4213
Zongchao Liu *Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Juan Li *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.
Xiaolin WangGuangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.
Peiyi XieDepartment of Radiology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.
Fei XiongDepartment of Radiology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.
Jiancong HuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.
Xiaochun MengDepartment of Radiology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.
Meijin HuangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.
Yanhong DengGuangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.
Ping LanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China.
Huichuan YuGuangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Disease, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China. yuhch5@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-8357-1615
Yanxin LuoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, Guangdong, China. luoyx25@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5200-3997
Sun Yat-sen University · CNColumbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to develop a radiomic model based on pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) to predict the pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment and tried to integrate our model with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomic signature.

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of the FOWARC randomized controlled trial. Radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment portal venous-phase contrast-enhanced CT images of 177 patients with rectal cancer. Patients were randomly allocated to the primary and validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was applied to select predictive features to build a radiomic signature for pCR prediction (rad-score). This CT-based rad-score was integrated with clinicopathological variables using gradient boosting machine (GBM) or MRI-based rad-score to construct comprehensive models for pCR prediction. The performance of CT-based model was evaluated and compared by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The LR (likelihood ratio) test and AIC (Akaike information criterion) were applied to compare CT-based rad-score, MRI-based rad-score and the combined rad-score.

resultsWe developed a CT-based rad-score for pCR prediction and a gradient boosting machine (GBM) model was built after clinicopathological variables were incorporated, with improved AUCs of 0.997 [95% CI 0.990-1.000] and 0.822 [95% CI 0.649-0.995] in the primary and validation cohort, respectively. Moreover, we constructed a combined model of CT- and MRI-based radiomic signatures that achieve better AIC (75.49 vs. 81.34 vs.82.39) than CT-based rad-score (P = 0.005) and MRI-based rad-score (P = 0.003) alone did.

conclusionsThe CT-based radiomic models we constructed may provide a useful and reliable tool to predict pCR after neoadjuvant treatment, identify patients that are appropriate for a 'watch and wait' approach, and thus avoid overtreatment. Moreover, the CT-based radiomic signature may add predictive value to the MRI-based models for clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsArea Under CurveHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyNeoadjuvant treatmentRadiomicsRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34112180
PMCPMC8194221
OpenAlexW3170507594

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.