Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34112841›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Three dimensional reconstruction of coronary artery stents from optical coherence tomography: experimental validation and clinical feasibility.

Wei Wu, Behram Khan, Mohammadali Sharzehee, Shijia Zhao, Saurabhi Samant, Yusuke Watanabe, Yoshinobu Murasato, Timothy Mickley, Andrew Bicek, Richard Bliss and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Wei Wu *Cardiovascular Biology and Biomechanics Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Behram Khan *Cardiovascular Biology and Biomechanics Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Mohammadali SharzeheeCardiovascular Biology and Biomechanics Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Shijia ZhaoCardiovascular Biology and Biomechanics Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Saurabhi SamantCardiovascular Biology and Biomechanics Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Yusuke WatanabeDepartment of Cardiology, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinobu MurasatoDepartment of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Timothy MickleyBoston Scientific Inc, Maple Grove, MN, USA.
Andrew BicekBoston Scientific Inc, Maple Grove, MN, USA.
Richard BlissMedtronic Inc, Santa Rosa, CA, USA.
Thomas ValenzuelaVisible Heart Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Paul A IaizzoVisible Heart Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Janaki MakadiaCardiovascular Biology and Biomechanics Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Anastasios PanagopoulosCardiovascular Biology and Biomechanics Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
Francesco BurzottaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Habib SamadySchool of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emmanouil S BrilakisMinneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
George D DangasDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, NY, USA.
Yves LouvardInstitut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France.
Goran StankovicDepartment of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Gabriele DubiniLaboratory of Biological Structure Mechanics (LaBS), Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta,", Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MigliavaccaLaboratory of Biological Structure Mechanics (LaBS), Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta,", Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Ghassan S KassabCalifornia Medical Innovation Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
Elazer R EdelmanInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA.
Claudio ChiastraPoliToBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Yiannis S ChatzizisisCardiovascular Biology and Biomechanics Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA. ychatzizisis@icloud.com.

Funding

Patient-Specific Simulations to Guide Coronary Bifurcation StentingR01HL144690 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHATZIZISIS, IOANNIS S · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural morphology of coronary stents (e.g. stent expansion, lumen scaffolding, strut apposition, tissue protrusion, side branch jailing, strut fracture), and the local hemodynamic environment after stent deployment are key determinants of procedural success and subsequent clinical outcomes. High-resolution intracoronary imaging has the potential to enable the geometrically accurate three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of coronary stents. The aim of this work was to present a novel algorithm for 3D stent reconstruction of coronary artery stents based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and angiography, and test experimentally its accuracy, reproducibility, clinical feasibility, and ability to perform computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies. Our method has the following steps: 3D lumen reconstruction based on OCT and angiography, stent strut segmentation in OCT images, packaging, rotation and straightening of the segmented struts, planar unrolling of the segmented struts, planar stent wireframe reconstruction, rolling back of the planar stent wireframe to the 3D reconstructed lumen, and final stent volume reconstruction. We tested the accuracy and reproducibility of our method in stented patient-specific silicone models using micro-computed tomography (μCT) and stereoscopy as references. The clinical feasibility and CFD studies were performed in clinically stented coronary bifurcations. The experimental and clinical studies showed that our algorithm (1) can reproduce the complex spatial stent configuration with high precision and reproducibility, (2) is feasible in 3D reconstructing stents deployed in bifurcations, and (3) enables CFD studies to assess the local hemodynamic environment within the stent. Notably, the high accuracy of our algorithm was consistent across different stent designs and diameters. Our method coupled with patient-specific CFD studies can lay the ground for optimization of stenting procedures, patient-specific computational stenting simulations, and research and development of new stent scaffolds and stenting techniques.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalStentsSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, Optical CoherenceAlgorithmsCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsHumansReproducibility of ResultsX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID34112841
PMCPMC8192920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.