Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34116708›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Integrating pharmacists into aged care facilities to improve the quality use of medicine (PiRACF Study): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Sam Kosari, Jane Koerner, Mark Naunton, Gregory M Peterson, Ibrahim Haider, Emily Lancsar, David Wright, Theo Niyonsenga, Rachel Davey

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Selection and reporting of usual care comparators when designing primary care trials of complex health interventions: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sam KosariDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia. sam.kosari@canberra.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6737-1442
Jane KoernerHealth Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia.
Mark NauntonDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia.
Gregory M PetersonDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia.
Ibrahim HaiderHealth Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia.
Emily LancsarDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.
David WrightSchool of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Theo NiyonsengaHealth Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia.
Rachel DaveyHealth Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication management in residential aged care facilities is an ongoing concern. Numerous studies have reported high rates of inappropriate prescribing and medication use in aged care facilities, which contribute to residents' adverse health outcomes. There is a need for new models of care that enhance inter-disciplinary collaboration between residential aged care facility staff and healthcare professionals, to improve medication management. Pilot research has demonstrated the feasibility and benefits of integrating a pharmacist into the aged care facility team to improve the quality use of medicines. This protocol describes the design and methods for a cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the outcomes and conduct economic evaluation of a service model where on-site pharmacists are integrated into residential aged care facility healthcare teams to improve medication management.

methodsIntervention aged care facilities will employ on-site pharmacists to work as part of their healthcare teams 2 to 2.5 days per week for 12 months. On-site pharmacists, in collaboration with facility nurses, prescribers, community pharmacists, residents and families will conduct medication management activities to improve the quality use of medicines. Aged care facilities in the control group will continue usual care. The target sample size is 1188 residents from a minimum of 13 aged care facilities. The primary outcome is the appropriateness of prescribing, measured by the proportion of residents who are prescribed at least one potentially inappropriate medicine according to the 2019 Beers Criteria. Secondary outcomes include hospital and emergency department presentations, fall rates, prevalence and dose of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Score, staff influenza vaccination rate, time spent on medication rounds, appropriateness of dose form modification and completeness of resident's allergy and adverse drug reaction documentation. A cost-consequence and cost-effectiveness analysis will be embedded in the trial. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide information on clinical and economic outcomes of a model that integrates on-site pharmacists into Australian residential aged care facilities. The results will provide policymakers with recommendations relevant to further implementation of this model.

trial registrationACTRN12620000430932 . Registered on 1 April 2020 with ANZCTR.

Indexed as

Nursing HomesPharmacistsAgedAustraliaHumansInappropriate PrescribingPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAged careCare homeCluster randomised controlled trialElderlyPharmacistsPotentially inappropriate medicineQuality use of medicinesResidential aged care facility

Identifiers

PMID34116708
PMCPMC8193166

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.