ArticleScientific reports2021
Segmental strain analysis for the detection of chronic ischemic scars in non-contrast cardiac MRI cine images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted left ventricular global longitudinal strain assessment in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a RESUS-AMI trial sub-analysis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Trial
- Article
- Transient overexpression of hPKM2 in porcine cardiomyocytes prevents heart failure after myocardial infarction.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Integrating radiomic texture analysis and deep learning for automated myocardial infarction detection in cine-MRI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning approaches for the detection of scar presence from cine cardiac magnetic resonance adding derived parametric images.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Review of Myocardial Ischemia, Scar, and Viability Estimation with Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence to derive aligned strain in cine CMR to detect patients with myocardial fibrosis: an open and scrutinizable approach.Research square · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence applied in cardiovascular disease: a bibliometric and visual analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- CCND2 Modified mRNA Activates Cell Cycle of Cardiomyocytes in Hearts With Myocardial Infarction in Mice and Pigs.Circulation research · 2023Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of left atrial function and strain for differentiating between acute and chronic myocardial infarction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Tropoelastin Improves Post-Infarct Cardiac Function.Circulation research · 2023Article
- Impact of myocardial injury on regional left ventricular function in the course of acute myocarditis with preserved ejection fraction: insights from segmental feature tracking strain analysis using cine cardiac MRI.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
- Segmental strain for scar detection in acute myocardial infarcts and in follow-up exams using non-contrast CMR cine sequences.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- A head-to-head comparison of myocardial strain by fast-strain encoding and feature tracking imaging in acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Patient-Specific Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking Approach for Scar Detection in Concomitant Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Heart Disease.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance segmental myocardial strain for detecting microvascular obstruction and late gadolinium enhancement in patients presenting after a ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is considered the gold standard for scar detection after myocardial infarction. In times of increasing skepticism about gadolinium depositions in brain tissue and contraindications of gadolinium administration in some patient groups, tissue strain-based techniques for detecting ischemic scars should be further developed as part of clinical protocols. Therefore, the objective of the present work was to investigate whether segmental strain is noticeably affected in chronic infarcts and thus can be potentially used for infarct detection based on routinely acquired non-contrast cine images in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD). Forty-six patients with known CAD and chronic scars in LGE images (5 female, mean age 52 ± 19 years) and 24 gender- and age-matched controls with normal cardiac MRI (2 female, mean age 47 ± 13 years) were retrospectively enrolled. Global (global peak circumferential [GPCS], global peak longitudinal [GPLS], global peak radial strain [GPRS]) and segmental (segmental peak circumferential [SPCS], segmental peak longitudinal [SPLS], segmental peak radial strain [SPRS]) strain parameters were calculated from standard non-contrast balanced SSFP cine sequences using commercially available software (Segment CMR, Medviso, Sweden). Visual wall motion assessment of short axis cine images as well as segmental circumferential strain calculations (endo-/epicardially contoured short axis cine and resulting polar plot strain map) of every patient and control were presented in random order to two independent blinded readers, which should localize potentially infarcted segments in those datasets blinded to LGE images and patient information. Global strain values were impaired in patients compared to controls (GPCS p = 0.02; GPLS p = 0.04; GPRS p = 0.01). Patients with preserved ejection fraction showed also impeded GPCS compared to healthy individuals (p = 0.04). In patients, mean SPCS was significantly impaired in subendocardially (- 5.4% ± 2) and in transmurally infarcted segments (- 1.2% ± 3) compared to remote myocardium (- 12.9% ± 3, p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). ROC analysis revealed an optimal cut-off value for SPCS for discriminating infarcted from remote myocardium of - 7.2% with a sensitivity of 89.4% and specificity of 85.7%. Mean SPRS was impeded in transmurally infarcted segments (15.9% ± 6) compared to SPRS of remote myocardium (31.4% ± 5; p = 0.02). The optimal cut-off value for SPRS for discriminating scar tissue from remote myocardium was 16.6% with a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 76.5%. 80.3% of all in LGE infarcted segments (118/147) were correctly localized in segmental circumferential strain calculations based on non-contrast cine images compared to 53.7% (79/147) of infarcted segments detected by visual wall motion assessment (p > 0.01). Global strain parameters are impaired in patients with chronic infarcts compared to controls. Mean SPCS and SPRS in scar tissue is impeded compared to remote myocardium in infarcts patients. Blinded to LGE images, two readers correctly localized 80% of infarcted segments in segmental circumferential strain calculations based on non-contrast cine images, in contrast to only 54% of infarcted segments detected due to wall motion abnormalities in visual wall motion assessment. Analysis of segmental circumferential strain shows a promising method for detection of chronic scars in routinely acquired, non-contrast cine images for patients who cannot receive or decline gadolinium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.