ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021
Molecular and Mechanical Mechanisms of Calcification Pathology Induced by Bicuspid Aortic Valve Abnormalities.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-Informed Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulations of Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Young Adults Reveal Regionalized Differences in Mechanical Stress.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Active endothelial and neural regulation of valve biology, health, and disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Dissecting sexual dimorphism in aortic valve stenosis by proteomics.Clinical proteomics · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of selected fetal echocardiographic parameters in the prenatally suspected bicuspid aortic valve.Echo research and practice · 2025Article
- Mechano-electrical-fluid interaction left-ventricle model for numerical evaluation of aortic valve hemodynamics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- miRNA Regulation of Cell Phenotype and Parietal Remodeling in Atherosclerotic and Non-Atherosclerotic Aortic Aneurysms: Differences and Similarities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Different calcification patterns of tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves and their clinical impact.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Review
- Valve Endothelial Cell Exposure to High Levels of Flow Oscillations Exacerbates Valve Interstitial Cell Calcification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Clinical implications of the biomechanics of bicuspid aortic valve and bicuspid aortopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Progressive Calcification in Bicuspid Valves: A Coupled Hemodynamics and Multiscale Structural Computations.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a congenital defect affecting 1-2% of the general population that is distinguished from the normal tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) by the existence of two, rather than three, functional leaflets (or cusps). BAV presents in different morphologic phenotypes based on the configuration of cusp fusion. The most common phenotypes are Type 1 (containing one raphe), where fusion between right coronary and left coronary cusps (BAV R/L) is the most common configuration followed by fusion between right coronary and non-coronary cusps (BAV R/NC). While anatomically different, BAV R/L and BAV R/NC configurations are both associated with abnormal hemodynamic and biomechanical environments. The natural history of BAV has shown that it is not necessarily the primary structural malformation that enforces the need for treatment in young adults, but the secondary onset of premature calcification in ~50% of BAV patients, that can lead to aortic stenosis. While an underlying genetic basis is a major pathogenic contributor of the structural malformation, recent studies have implemented computational models, cardiac imaging studies, and bench-top methods to reveal BAV-associated hemodynamic and biomechanical alterations that likely contribute to secondary complications. Contributions to the field, however, lack support for a direct link between the external valvular environment and calcific aortic valve disease in the setting of BAV R/L and R/NC BAV. Here we review the literature of BAV hemodynamics and biomechanics and discuss its previously proposed contribution to calcification. We also offer means to improve upon previous studies in order to further characterize BAV and its secondary complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.