Evidence mapPaperPMID 34126260Full record

ArticleRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2021

Influence of muscular contraction on vascular conductance during exercise above versus below critical power.

Shane M Hammer, Stephen T Hammond, Shannon K Parr, Andrew M Alexander, Vanessa-Rose G Turpin, Zachary J White, Kaylin D Didier, Joshua R Smith, Thomas J Barstow, Carl J Ade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Is there a critical rate of torque development?European journal of applied physiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Interactive effects of exercise intensity and recovery posture on postexercise hypotension.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Interaction of Factors Determining Critical Power.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shane M HammerDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, MN, USA. Electronic address: hammer.shane@mayo.edu.
Stephen T HammondDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, USA.
Shannon K ParrDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, USA.
Andrew M AlexanderDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, USA.
Vanessa-Rose G TurpinDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, USA.
Zachary J WhiteDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, USA.
Kaylin D DidierDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, USA.
Joshua R SmithDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, MN, USA.
Thomas J BarstowDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, USA.
Carl J AdeDepartment of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, USA.

Funding

CARDIOVASOLOGYT32HL007111 · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · 1985 to 2025
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007111NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that limb vascular conductance (LVC) would increase during the immediate recovery phase of dynamic exercise above, but not below, critical power (CP) indicating a threshold for muscular contraction-induced impedance of limb blood flow (LBF). CP (115 ± 26 W) was determined in 7 men and 7 women who subsequently performed ∼5 min of near-supine cycling exercise both below and above CP. LVC demonstrated a greater increase during immediate recovery and remained significantly higher following exercise above, compared to below, CP (all p < 0.001). Power output was associated with the immediate increases in LVC following exercise above, but not below, CP (p < 0.001; r = 0.85). Additionally, variance in percent LBF impedance was significantly lower above (CV: 10.7 %), compared to below (CV: 53.2 %), CP (p < 0.01). CP appears to represent a threshold above which the characteristics of LBF impedance by muscular contraction become intensity-dependent. These data suggest a critical level of LBF impedance relative to contraction intensity exists and, once attained, may promote the progressive metabolic and neuromuscular responses known to occur above CP.

Indexed as

AdultBicyclingBlood CirculationElectric ImpedanceExerciseFemaleFemoral ArteryHumansLower ExtremityMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalUltrasonography, DopplerYoung AdultContraction impedanceCritical powerLimb blood flowVascular conductance

Identifiers

PMID34126260
PMCPMC8877527

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.