Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34129141›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2021

[Neuropathology of dementia].

Sigrid Klotz, Ellen Gelpi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sigrid KlotzAbteilung für Neuropathologie und Neurochemie, Universitätsklinik für Neurologie, Medizinischer Universitätscampus Wien, Ebene 4J, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3096-2852
Ellen GelpiAbteilung für Neuropathologie und Neurochemie, Universitätsklinik für Neurologie, Medizinischer Universitätscampus Wien, Ebene 4J, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich. ellen.gelpi@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2948-4187

Funding

Hochschuljubiläumsfonds der Stadt Wien H-283459/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia is the clinical consequence of various neurological disorders with a multitude of etiologies. Precise knowledge of the underlying pathologies is essential for an accurate treatment of patients and for the development of suitable disease biomarkers. A definite diagnosis of many of the disorders, particularly for neurodegenerative ones, can only be made after a thorough postmortem neuropathological examination. This highlights the importance of performing a brain autopsy and the relevance of a close interaction between clinicians, neuroimaging disciplines and neuropathologists as well as with basic researchers. This article aims to give a brief overview on the neuropathology of dementia focusing on neurodegenerative diseases, to further facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration.

Indexed as

DementiaNeurodegenerative DiseasesAutopsyBrainHumansNeuropathologyBiomarkerDementiaNeurodegenerationNeuropathologyProteinopathies

Identifiers

PMID34129141
PMCPMC8397629

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.