Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34131038›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Under Threat, Weaker Evidence Is Required to Reach Undesirable Conclusions.

Laura K Globig, Kristin Witte, Gloria Feng, Tali Sharot

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Laura K GlobigAffective Brain Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom laura.globig.15@ucl.ac.uk t.sharot@ucl.ac.uk.
Kristin WitteUniversity of Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany.
Gloria FengYale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8205.
Tali SharotAffective Brain Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom laura.globig.15@ucl.ac.uk t.sharot@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics · DEYale University · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical decisions, such as in domains ranging from medicine to finance, are often made under threatening circumstances that elicit stress and anxiety. The negative effects of such reactions on learning and decision-making have been repeatedly underscored. In contrast, here we show that perceived threat alters the process by which evidence is accumulated in a way that may be adaptive. Participants (

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalStress, PsychologicalAdultAnxietyComputer SimulationDecision MakingFearFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleanxietyevidence accumulationsequential samplingstressthreatvalence

Identifiers

PMID34131038
PMCPMC8318074
OpenAlexW3168110551

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.