Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34135771›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2021

Proteomics and Epidemiological Models of Human Aging.

Ceereena Ubaida-Mohien, Ruin Moaddel, Ann Zenobia Moore, Pei-Lun Kuo, Faraz Faghri, Ravi Tharakan, Toshiko Tanaka, Mike A Nalls, Luigi Ferrucci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hematopoietic Stem Cells and the Immune System in Development and Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ceereena Ubaida-MohienBiomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Ruin MoaddelBiomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Ann Zenobia MooreBiomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Pei-Lun KuoBiomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Faraz FaghriCenter for Alzheimer's and Related Dementias, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Ravi TharakanBiomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Toshiko TanakaBiomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Mike A NallsCenter for Alzheimer's and Related Dementias, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Luigi FerrucciBiomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

Biomarkers of Homestatic Dysregulation in Aging and Chronic DiseaseZIAAG000971 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI FERRUCCI, LUIGI · 2009 to 2025
$1.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human aging is associated with a decline of physical and cognitive function and high susceptibility to chronic diseases, which is influenced by genetics, epigenetics, environmental, and socio-economic status. In order to identify the factors that modulate the aging process, established measures of aging mechanisms are required, that are both robust and feasible in humans. It is also necessary to connect these measures to the phenotypes of aging and their functional consequences. In this review, we focus on how this has been addressed from an epidemiologic perspective using proteomics. The key aspects of epidemiological models of aging can be incorporated into proteomics and other omics which can provide critical detailed information on the molecular and biological processes that change with age, thus unveiling underlying mechanisms that drive multiple chronic conditions and frailty, and ideally facilitating the identification of new effective approaches for prevention and treatment.

Indexed as

aging modelsbiological pathwaysepidemiological modelslongitudinal cross-sectionalmachine learning and artificial intelligencephenotypesproteomicsresilience

Identifiers

PMID34135771
PMCPMC8202502

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.