ArticleJB & JS open access
Rates of Osteoporosis Management and Secondary Preventative Treatment After Primary Fragility Fractures.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteoporosis medication initiation after proximal humerus fractures is low, but associated with decreased secondary fragility fracture risk.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2026Article
- A territorially coordinated, eHealth-supported fracture liaison service following femur fragility fracture: a pilot randomised controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Web-Based Application (Wellhealth) for Osteoporosis Medication Management in Older Adults: Prospective Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic utility of serum TRACP5b for secondary osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis: a comparative cross-sectional study with primary osteoporosis and healthy controls.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Osteoporosis documentation following hip fracture: a retrospective cohort study from a tertiary hospital.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- A programmatic approach to osteoporosis treatment: insight from a 20-year longitudinal study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Article
- Alternative Osteoporosis Therapies After Bisphosphonate Associated Atypical Femur Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Bone Optimization for Perioperative Spine Patients: A Multidisciplinary Approach at a Single Academic Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Osteoporotic Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: an In-Depth Review of Current Management Options.Current osteoporosis reports · 2025Review
- The Impact of Fracture Liaison Services on Outcomes in Older Patients: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Inpatient rehabilitation fracture liaison service (FLS) improves outcomes for secondary prevention of hip fractures.Bone reports · 2025Article
- Time Is Bone: Missed Opportunities for Secondary Prevention After a Hip Fracture.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Osteoporosis management in patients presenting to the emergency department with fragility fractures: A retrospective observational study.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Article
- Bone Health, Fragility Fractures, and the Hand Surgeon.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Review
- Suboptimal osteoporosis care in hospitalized patients: a retrospective analysis of vertebral compression fractures detected on computed tomography.Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- Individuals with a fragility fracture and a prescription for bone active medication have a positive perception of the medication but do not associate it with fracture risk reduction.Archives of osteoporosis · 2024Article
- Burden of chronic corticosteroid use among patients with ulcerative colitis initiated on targeted treatment or conventional therapy in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2024Article
- Incidence Rate and Factors Associated With Fractures Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Ankylosing Spondylitis in the United States.Arthritis care & research · 2024Article
- Characterization and effectiveness of a Fracture Liaison Services program in Colombia.Archives of osteoporosis · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fragility fractures are often sentinel events in documenting new cases of osteoporosis. Numerous analyses have demonstrated low rates of adequate osteoporosis evaluation and treatment following primary fragility fractures. The purpose of this study was to quantify the incidence of primary fragility fractures in America and the rates of osteoporosis screening and management before and after fracture.
methodsA retrospective review of the PearlDiver database was conducted using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients who were 60 to 80 years of age and had primary fragility fractures of the hip, wrist, spine, pelvis, humerus, and other unspecified locations were included. The rates of dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy were assessed for 2 years before and 2 years after the primary fracture.
resultsIn this study, 48,668 patients with a primary fragility fracture were identified. Within this cohort, 25.8% (12,573 of 48,668) had received osteoporosis screening or treatment in the prior 2 years. In the 36,095 patients with no management before the fracture, 19% (6,799 patients) were diagnosed with osteoporosis and 18.4% (6,653 patients) received a DXA scan and/or filed claims for pharmacotherapy in the following 2 years. Patients with an osteoporosis diagnosis were more likely to receive both types of management (odds ratio [OR], 11.55 [95% confidence (CI), 10.31 to 12.95]), and male patients were less likely to receive both types of management (OR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.27]). Secondary fragility fractures within the next 2 years were diagnosed in 8.4% (3,038 of 36,095) of patients at a mean of 221 days following the primary fracture.
conclusionsThe rates of appropriate osteoporosis evaluation, diagnosis, and management following primary fragility fractures remain unacceptably low. Less than one-third of patients with primary fragility fractures had been evaluated or treated for osteoporosis in the 2 years prior to fracture. Furthermore, among patients without pre-fracture management, <20% received osteoporosis screening or treatment within the next 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.