Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34137433›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2021

What Determines Step-Rate at Work? An Investigation of Factors at the Shift, Worker, Ward, and Nursing Home Levels in Eldercare.

Matthew L Stevens, Kristina Karstad, Svend Erik Mathiassen, Leticia Bergamin Januario, Andreas Holtermann, David M Hallman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew L StevensDepartment of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 København Ø, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2621-4811
Kristina KarstadDepartment of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 København Ø, Denmark.
Svend Erik MathiassenCentre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden.
Leticia Bergamin JanuarioCentre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden.
Andreas HoltermannDepartment of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Physical Workload, The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 København Ø, Denmark.
David M HallmanCentre for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, 801 76 Gävle, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCurrent knowledge on the determinants of step-rate at different organizational levels is limited. Thus, our aim was to identify, in eldercare, at what workplace level differences in step-rate occur and to identify determinants of workers' step-rate at these levels.

methodsParticipants were 420 eldercare workers from 17 nursing homes (126 wards) in Denmark. Accelerometry was used to assess step-rate (steps per hour) of workers over multiple shifts. We assessed various determinants at different levels of the workplace, i.e. at the (i) shift, (ii) worker, (iii) ward, and (iv) nursing home levels. Variance components analysis identified the percentage contribution to total variance in step-rate from each respective level. Multi-level linear regression modelling was used to investigate the association between candidate determinants at each level and step-rate.

resultsDifferences in eldercare workers' step-rate occurred primarily between shifts (within workers; 44.9%) and between workers (within wards; 49.1%). A higher step-rate was associated with: (i) weekend and evening shifts (versus weekday/day); (ii) job as a care helper (versus care aide) and an increased proportion of time spent on direct care tasks; (iii) working in a somatic ward (versus dementia), an increased resident-staff ratio and permission to take unscheduled breaks; and (iv) lack of elevators.

conclusionsWe found that nearly all variability in step-rate in eldercare work occurs between shifts (within workers) and between workers (within wards). The main determinants of step-rate were related to the type of shift, type of work tasks, staffing ratio, break policy, and availability of elevators.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureHospitalsHumansNursing HomesWorkforceWorkplaceaccelerometryeldercare workersmixed-effects regression modellingphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID34137433
PMCPMC8501986

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.