ReviewMolecular biology reports2021
Lens regeneration: scientific discoveries and clinical possibilities.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A preliminary comparative study of peripheral capsular linear incision versus circular micro-tear capsulotomy for in situ lens regeneration.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Lens aging and disease: Molecular mechanisms, functional consequences, and pharmacological implications.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2026Review
- Lens Regeneration: The Application of iSyTE and In Silico Approaches to Evaluate Gene Expression in Lens Organoids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Lens regenerationiScience · 2023Article
- The miRNA-34a/Sirt1/p53 pathway in a rat model of lens regeneration.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Nicotinamide improves in vitro lens regeneration in a mouse capsular bag model.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Article
- Grand Challenges and Opportunities in Surgical Ophthalmology: Together for a Shared Future.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Insights into Bone Morphogenetic Protein-(BMP-) Signaling in Ocular Lens Biology and Pathology.Cells · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the process of exploring new methods for cataract treatment, lens regeneration is an ideal strategy for effectively restoring accommodative vision and avoiding postoperative complications and has great clinical potential. Lens regeneration, which is not a simple repetition of lens development, depends on the complex regulatory network comprising the FGF, BMP/TGF-β, Notch, and Wnt signaling pathways. Current research mainly focuses on in situ and in vitro lens regeneration. On the one hand, the possibility of the autologous stem cell in situ regeneration of functional lenses has been confirmed; on the other hand, both embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells have been induced into lentoid bodies in vitro which are similar to the natural lens to a certain extent. This article will briefly summarize the regulatory mechanisms of lens development, describe the recent progress of lens regeneration, explore the key molecular signaling pathways, and, more importantly, discuss the prospects and challenges of their clinical applications to provide reference for clinical transformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34143397What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.