Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34144277›Full record

ReviewBioorganic chemistry2021

Potential drug development and therapeutic approaches for clinical intervention in COVID-19.

Jayanta Dowarah, Brilliant N Marak, Umesh Chand Singh Yadav, Ved Prakash Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioorganic chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jayanta DowarahDepartment of Chemistry, School of Physical Sciences, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, Mizoram, India.
Brilliant N MarakDepartment of Chemistry, School of Physical Sciences, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, Mizoram, India.
Umesh Chand Singh YadavSpecial Centre for Molecular Medicine, JNU, New Delhi 110067, India.
Ved Prakash SinghDepartment of Chemistry, School of Physical Sciences, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, Mizoram, India; Department of Industrial Chemistry, School of Physical Sciences, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, Mizoram, India. Electronic address: vpsingh@mzu.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the vaccination is now available to many countries and will slowly dissipate to others, effective therapeutics for COVID-19 is still illusive. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to researchers, scientists, and clinicians and affected the wellbeing of millions of people worldwide. Since the beginning of the pandemic, a multitude of existing anti-viral, antibiotic, antimalarial, and anticancer drugs have been tested, and some have shown potency in the treatment and management of COVID-19, albeit others failed to leave any positive impact and a few also became controversial as they showed mixed clinical outcomes. In the present article, we have brought together some of the candidate therapeutic drugs being repurposed or used in the clinical trials and discussed their clinical efficacy and safety for COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDrug DevelopmentAntiviral AgentsClinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19Drug RepositioningHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Antiviral AgentsClinical TrialsCoronavirusCOVID-19Drug developmentSARS-CoV-2Therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID34144277
PMCPMC8143914

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.