Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34149413›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021

Autophagy Blockade by Ai Du Qing Formula Promotes Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer Stem Cells Via GRP78/β-Catenin/ABCG2 Axis.

Mianmian Liao, Caiwei Wang, Bowen Yang, Danping Huang, Yifeng Zheng, Shengqi Wang, Xuan Wang, Juping Zhang, Chunbian Tang, Zheng Xu and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Clinical implications of forkhead box M1, cyclooxygenase-2World journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
  11. Traditional Chinese Medicine for Breast Cancer: A Review.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. International journal of general medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mianmian LiaoThe Research Center for Integrative Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Caiwei WangThe Research Center for Integrative Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Bowen YangThe Research Center for Integrative Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Danping HuangShenzhen Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yifeng ZhengIntegrative Research Laboratory of Breast Cancer, The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shengqi WangIntegrative Research Laboratory of Breast Cancer, The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xuan WangIntegrative Research Laboratory of Breast Cancer, The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Juping ZhangIntegrative Research Laboratory of Breast Cancer, The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Chunbian TangDepartment of Hepatology, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China.
Zheng XuThe Research Center for Integrative Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yu HeThe Research Center for Integrative Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ruolin HuangThe Research Center for Integrative Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Fengxue ZhangThe Research Center for Integrative Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiyu WangIntegrative Research Laboratory of Breast Cancer, The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Neng WangThe Research Center for Integrative Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that the root of drug chemoresistance in breast cancer is tightly associated with subpopulations of cancer stem cells (CSCs), whose activation is largely dependent on taxol-promoting autophagy. Our pilot study identified GRP78 as a specific marker for chemoresistance potential of breast CSCs by regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Ai Du Qing (ADQ) is a traditional Chinese medicine formula that has been utilized in the treatment cancer, particularly during the consolidation phase. In the present study, we investigated the regulatory effects and molecular mechanisms of ADQ in promoting autophagy-related breast cancer chemosensitivity. ADQ with taxol decreasing the cell proliferation and colony formation of breast cancer cells, which was accompanied by suppressed breast CSC ratio, limited self-renewal capability, as well as attenuated multi-differentiation. Furthermore, autophagy in ADQ-treated breast CSCs was blocked by taxol

Indexed as

Ai Du Qing formulaautophagybreast cancer chemosensitivitycancer stem cellsGRP78/β-catenin/ABCG2 axis

Identifiers

PMID34149413
PMCPMC8210424
OpenAlexW3172680015

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.