Evidence mapPaperPMID 34153171Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2021

Blood pressure variability and cognitive dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies.

Tzu-Jung Chiu, Jiunn-Tyng Yeh, Chi-Jung Huang, Chern-En Chiang, Shih-Hsien Sung, Chen-Huan Chen, Hao-Min Cheng

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reply.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Live long and PROSPERO: A comment on Chiu and coworkers.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tzu-Jung ChiuDepartment of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4667-2112
Jiunn-Tyng YehDepartment of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2595-1892
Chi-Jung HuangCenter for Evidence-Based Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chern-En ChiangDepartment of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shih-Hsien SungDepartment of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen-Huan ChenDepartment of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hao-Min ChengDepartment of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3885-6600
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The variability of blood pressure (BPV) has been suggested as a clinical indicator for cognitive dysfunction, yet the results from clinical studies are variable. This study investigated the relationship between BPV and the risk of cognitive decline or dementia. Bibliographic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, were searched systematically for longitudinal cohort studies with BPV measurements and neuropsychological examinations or dementia diagnosis. A traditional meta-analysis with subgroup analysis, and a further dose-response meta-analysis were conducted. Twenty cohort studies with 7 924 168 persons were included in this review. The results showed that a higher systolic BPV (SBPV), when measured with the coefficient of variation (SBP-CV) or standard deviation (SBP-SD), was associated with a higher risk of all-cause dementia diagnosis but not incidence of cognitive decline on neuropsychological examinations. In subgroup analysis, the effect was more prominent when using BPV of shorter timeframes, during shorter follow-ups, or among the elderly aged more than 65 years. No dose-response relationship could be found. Our study suggested possible positive associations between SBPV and the risk of dementia. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionHypertensionAgedBlood PressureCohort StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesRisk Factorsblood pressure variabilitycognitive dysfunctioncohort studiesdementiameta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID34153171
PMCPMC8678719
OpenAlexW3177036465

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.