Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34156515›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021

[Diagnostic markers in urology].

Marie C Hupe, Marie C Hempel, Severin Rodler, Maria Frantzi, Harald Mischak, Axel S Merseburger, Christian G Stief, Michael Chaloupka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marie C HupeKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23638, Lübeck, Deutschland. mariechristine.hupe@uksh.de.
Marie C HempelKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23638, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Severin RodlerUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik des Klinikums der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Maria FrantziAbteilung für Biomarkerforschung, Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Deutschland.
Harald MischakAbteilung für Biomarkerforschung, Mosaiques Diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Deutschland.
Axel S MerseburgerKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23638, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Christian G StiefUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik des Klinikums der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Michael ChaloupkaUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik des Klinikums der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. michael.chaloupka@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer diagnostics can be supplemented by disease-related biomarkers. In the course of modern patient-tailored cancer treatment, the importance of correct risk stratification, prognosis and monitoring has significantly increased. In recent years, a multitude of biomarkers and related test procedures have emerged to fulfil this purpose. The following review article summarizes the most recent developments with respect to the use of biomarkers in the diagnostics of urological cancers.

Indexed as

Urologic NeoplasmsUrologyBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorHumansPrognosisBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersDiagnosticsLiquid biopsyNon-invasiveRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID34156515

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.