Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34159447›Full record

ArticleCalcified tissue international2021

MOF/Hip Fracture Ratio in a Belgian Cohort of Post-menopausal Women (FRISBEE): Potential Impact on the FRAX® Score.

A Mugisha, P Bergmann, V Kinnard, L Iconaru, F Baleanu, A Charles, M Surquin, S Rozenberg, F Benoit, J J Body

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Calcified tissue international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Selection for treatment of patients at high risk of fracture by the short versus long term prediction models - data from the Belgian FRISBEE cohort.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A MugishaDepartment of Geriatrics, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4 Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium. aude.ndamama@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7278-0670
P BergmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
V KinnardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
L IconaruDepartment of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
F BaleanuDepartment of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
A CharlesDepartment of Internal Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
M SurquinDepartment of Geriatrics, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4 Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium.
S RozenbergDepartment of Gynaecology-Obstetrics, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
F BenoitDepartment of Geriatrics, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Place van Gehuchten 4 Laeken, 1020, Brussels, Belgium.
J J BodyLaboratory of Translational Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ratio between major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) and hip fractures in the Belgian FRAX® tool to predict fractures is currently based on Swedish data. We determined these ratios in a prospective cohort of Belgian postmenopausal women. 3560 women, aged 60-85 years (70.1 ± 6.4 years), were included in a prospective study from 2007 to 2013 and surveyed yearly (FRISBEE). We analyzed the number of validated incident fractures until October 2020 by age and sites and compared the MOFs/hip ratios in this cohort with those from the Swedish databases. We registered 1336 fractures (mean follow-up of 9.1 years). The MOFs/hip ratios extracted from the FRISBEE cohort were 10.7 [95% CI: (5.6-20.5)], 6.4 [4.7-8.7], and 5.0 [3.9-6.5] for women of 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89 years old, respectively. These ratios were 1.7-1.8 times higher for all age groups than those from the Swedish data, which decreased from 6.5 (60-64 years group) down to 1.8 (85-89 age group). The overall MOFs/hip ratio in Frisbee was 6.0 [5.9-6.1], which was higher than any Swedish ratio between 65 and 85 years. Nevertheless, the decrease of the ratios with age paralleled that observed in Sweden. In this Brussels prospective cohort, MOFs/hip ratios were 1.7-1.8 times those observed in Sweden currently used for MOFs prediction in the Belgian FRAX® version. This discrepancy can greatly modify the estimation of the risk of MOFs, which is among the main criteria used to recommend a pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis in several countries.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesOsteoporotic FracturesAdolescentAdultBelgiumBone DensityChildFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostmenopauseProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsYoung AdultAgingFracture predictionFRAXHip fractureMOFOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID34159447
OpenAlexW3176033318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.