Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34159543›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Visit Linearity in Primary Care Visits for Patients with Chronic Pain on Long-term Opioid Therapy.

Anne Elizabeth Clark White, Eve Angeline Hood-Medland, Richard L Kravitz, Stephen G Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne Elizabeth Clark White *Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. aecwhite@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6574-2812
Eve Angeline Hood-Medland *Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Richard L KravitzDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Stephen G HenryDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001860 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KENYON, NICHOLAS J., LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2016 to 2025
$47.3M
UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000002 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2012 to 2015
$12.2M
UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterKL2TR000134 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2012 to 2015
$3.1M
Quality Safety Comparative Effectiveness Research Training (QSCERT)T32HS022236 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MELNIKOW, JOY · 2013 to 2018
$2.1M
A clinician training intervention to improve pain-related communication, pain management and opioid prescribing in primary careK23DA043052 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HENRY, STEPHEN G · 2017 to 2019
$591k
AHRQ HHS T32 HS022236AHRQ HHS T32HS022236HRSA HHS T32HP30037NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000134NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000002NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001860NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA043052NIH HHS K23DA043052NIH HHS KL2TR000134NIH HHS UL1TR000002NIH HHS UL1TR001860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians and patients report frustration after primary care visits for chronic pain. The need to shift between multiple clinical topics to address competing demands during visits may contribute to this frustration.

objectiveThis study creates a novel measure, "visit linearity," to assess visit organization and examines whether visits that require less shifting back and forth between topics are associated with better patient and physician visit experiences. It also explores whether visit linearity differs depending on the following: (1) whether or not pain is a major topic of the visit and (2) whether or not pain is the first topic raised.

designThis study analyzed 41 video-recorded visits using inductive, qualitative analysis informed by conversation analysis. We used linear regression to evaluate associations between visit organization and post-visit measures of participant experience.

participantsPatients were established adult patients planning to discuss pain management during routine primary care. Physicians were internal or family medicine residents. MAIN MEASURES: Visit linearity, total topics, return topics, topic shifts, time per topic, visit duration, pain main topic, pain first topic, patient experience, and physician difficulty. KEY

resultsVisits had a mean of 8.1 total topics (standard deviation (SD)=3.46), 14.5 topic shifts (SD=6.28), and 1.9 topic shifts per topic (SD=0.62). Less linear visits (higher topic shifts to topic ratio) were associated with greater physician visit difficulty (β=7.28, p<0.001) and worse patient experience (β= -0.62, p=0.03). Visit linearity was not significantly impacted by pain as a major or first topic raised.

conclusionsIn primary care visits for patients with chronic pain taking opioids, more linear visits were associated with better physician and patient experience. Frequent topic shifts may be disruptive. If confirmed in future research, this finding implies that reducing shifts between topics could help decrease mutual frustration related to discussions about pain.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidChronic PainAdultHumansOffice VisitsPain ManagementPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareAnalgesics, Opioidchronic painopioid analgesicsphysician-patient communicationprimary carevisit linearityvisit organization

Identifiers

PMID34159543
PMCPMC8738805

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.