Evidence mapPaperPMID 34159708Full record

Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2021

Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg in patients aged younger than 65 and 65 years or older: Post hoc analysis of the AWARD-11 trial.

Juan P Frias, Enzo Bonora, Luis Nevárez Ruiz, Stanley H Hsia, Heike Jung, Sohini Raha, David A Cox, M Angelyn Bethel, Manige Konig

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Juan P FriasNational Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9486-1255
Enzo BonoraUniversity and University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Luis Nevárez RuizHospital Angeles, Chihuahua, Mexico.
Stanley H HsiaNational Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Heike JungLilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Sohini RahaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
David A CoxEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2052-9836
M Angelyn BethelEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Manige KonigEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1584-8309
Eli Lilly (United States) · USNational Research Institute · USAutonomous University of Chihuahua · MXEli Lilly (Germany) · DEUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg versus 1.5 mg when used as an add-on to metformin in subgroups defined by age (<65 and ≥65 years). MATERIALS AND

methodsOf 1842 patients included in this post hoc analysis, 438 were aged 65 years or older and 1404 were younger than 65 years. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population, while on treatment without rescue medication, was used for all efficacy analyses; the ITT population without rescue medication was used for hypoglycaemia analyses; all other safety analyses used the ITT population.

resultsPatients aged 65 years or older and those younger than 65 years had a mean age of 69.5 and 53.2 years, respectively. In each age subgroup, the reduction from baseline in HbA1c and body weight (BW), and the proportion of patients achieving a composite endpoint of HbA1c of less than 7% (<53 mmol/mol) with no weight gain and no documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycaemia, were larger for dulaglutide 3.0 and 4.5 mg compared with dulaglutide 1.5 mg, but the treatment-by-age interactions were not significant. The safety profile for the additional dulaglutide doses was consistent with that of dulaglutide 1.5 mg and was similar between the age subgroups.

conclusionDulaglutide doses of 3.0 or 4.5 mg provided clinically relevant, dose-related improvements in HbA1c and BW with no significant treatment-by-age interactions, and with a similar safety profile across age subgroups.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsAgedGlucagon-Like PeptidesGlycated HemoglobinHumansImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsMiddle AgedRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTreatment OutcomedulaglutideGlucagon-Like PeptidesGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsRecombinant Fusion Proteinsbody weightdulaglutideelderlyGLP-1 RAsglycaemic controltype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34159708
PMCPMC8518960
OpenAlexW3176961827

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.