Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34159734›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2021

Novel Chlamydiae and Amoebophilus endosymbionts are prevalent in wild isolates of the model social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.

Tamara S Haselkorn, Daniela Jimenez, Usman Bashir, Eleni Sallinger, David C Queller, Joan E Strassmann, Susanne DiSalvo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Temperature Affects the Host Range of Rhabdochlamydia porcellionis.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Complexities of Inferring Symbiont Function:Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tamara S HaselkornDepartment of Biology, University of Central Arkansas, 201 Donaghey Avenue, Conway, AR, 72035, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9899-0326
Daniela JimenezDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Usman BashirDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Eleni SallingerDepartment of Biology, University of Central Arkansas, 201 Donaghey Avenue, Conway, AR, 72035, USA.
David C QuellerDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Joan E StrassmannDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Susanne DiSalvoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, 44 Circle Drive, Edwardsville, IL, 62026, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4001-4672
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Central Arkansas · USSouthern Illinois University Edwardsville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amoebae interact with bacteria in multifaceted ways. Amoeba predation can serve as a selective pressure for the development of bacterial virulence traits. Bacteria may also adapt to life inside amoebae, resulting in symbiotic relationships. Indeed, particular lineages of obligate bacterial endosymbionts have been found in different amoebae. Here, we screened an extensive collection of Dictyostelium discoideum wild isolates for the presence of these bacterial symbionts using endosymbiont specific PCR primers. We find that these symbionts are surprisingly common, identified in 42% of screened isolates (N = 730). Members of the Chlamydiae phylum are particularly prevalent, occurring in 27% of the amoeba isolated. They are novel and phylogenetically distinct from other Chlamydiae. We also found Amoebophilus symbionts in 8% of screened isolates (N = 730). Antibiotic-cured amoebae behave similarly to their Chlamydiae or Amoebophilus-infected counterparts, suggesting that these endosymbionts do not significantly impact host fitness, at least in the laboratory. We found several natural isolates were co-infected with multiple endosymbionts, with no obvious fitness effect of co-infection under laboratory conditions. The high prevalence and novelty of amoeba endosymbiont clades in the model organism D. discoideum opens the door to future research on the significance and mechanisms of amoeba-symbiont interactions.

Indexed as

AmoebaDictyosteliumBacteriaBacteroidetesSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID34159734
PMCPMC8518690
OpenAlexW3175463636

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.