Evidence mapPaperPMID 34172020Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2021

Uptake of new antidiabetic medicines in 11 European countries.

Nika Mardetko, Urska Nabergoj Makovec, Igor Locatelli, Andrej Janez, Mitja Kos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Inequalities in Diabetes Mortality Between Microregions in Hungary.International journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nika MardetkoDepartment of Social Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Pharmacy, Askerceva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Urska Nabergoj MakovecDepartment of Social Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Pharmacy, Askerceva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-3314
Igor LocatelliDepartment of Social Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Pharmacy, Askerceva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-8986
Andrej JanezDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska Cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6594-5254
Mitja KosDepartment of Social Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Pharmacy, Askerceva cesta 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. mitja.kos@ffa.uni-lj.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6801-6450

Funding

Slovene Research Agency P1-0189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral new antidiabetic medicines (GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, and SGLT-2 inhibitors) have been approved by the European Medicines Agency since 2006. The aim of this study was to evaluate the uptake of new antidiabetic medicines in European countries over a 10-year period.

methodsThe study used IQVIA quarterly value and volume sales data January 2006-December 2016. The market uptake of new antidiabetic medicines together with intensity of prescribing policy for all antidiabetic medicines were estimated for Austria, Croatia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. The following measures were determined: number of available new active substances, median time to first continuous use, volume market share, and annual therapy cost.

resultsAll countries had at least one new antidiabetic medicine in continuous use and an increase in intensity of prescribing policy for all antidiabetic medicines was observed. A tenfold difference in median time to first continuous use (3-30 months) was found. The annual therapy cost in 2016 of new antidiabetic medicines ranged from EUR 363 to EUR 769. Among new antidiabetic medicines, the market share of DPP-4 inhibitors was the highest. Countries with a higher volume market share of incretin-based medicines (Spain, France, Austria, and Germany) in 2011 had a lower increase in intensity of prescribing policy. This kind of correlation was not found in the case of SGLT-2 inhibitors.

conclusionsThis study found important differences and variability in the uptake of new antidiabetic medicines in the included countries.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsDrug ApprovalEuropeGlucagon-Like Peptide 1HumansHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Hypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsDiabetes MellitusDipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 inhibitorsGlucagon-Like Peptide 1 receptor agonistsInsulinsMarket uptakeSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34172020
PMCPMC8235847

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.