Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34177549›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2021

Multidisciplinary Tinnitus Research: Challenges and Future Directions From the Perspective of Early Stage Researchers.

Jorge Piano Simoes, Elza Daoud, Maryam Shabbir, Sana Amanat, Kelly Assouly, Roshni Biswas, Chiara Casolani, Albi Dode, Falco Enzler, Laure Jacquemin and 13 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reverse Correlation Characterizes More Complete Tinnitus Spectra in Patients.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 16 institutions in 10 countries.

Jorge Piano SimoesDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Elza DaoudCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Maryam ShabbirHearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sana AmanatOtology & Neurotology Group CTS 495, Department of Genomic Medicine, GENYO - Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research Pfizer/University of Granada/Junta de Andalucía, PTS, Granada, Spain.
Kelly AssoulyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Roshni BiswasHearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Chiara CasolaniHearing Systems, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Albi DodeInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Falco EnzlerCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Laure JacqueminDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Mie JoergensenHearing Systems, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Tori KokEar Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nuwan LiyanageUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matheus LourencoExperimental Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Punitkumar MakaniDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Muntazir MehdiInstitute of Distributed Systems, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Anissa L RamadhaniRadiological Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Constanze RihaChair of Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jose Lopez SantacruzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Axel SchillerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Stefan SchoisswohlDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Natalia TrpchevskaDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Experimental Audiology Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eleni GenitsaridiHearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
University of Regensburg · DEAix-Marseille Université · FRTechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Nottingham · GBAntwerp University Hospital · BEKarolinska Institutet · SEMaastricht University · NLMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITNottingham Biomedical Research Centre · GBPfizer-University of Granada-Junta de Andalucía Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research · ESUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tinnitus can be a burdensome condition on both individual and societal levels. Many aspects of this condition remain elusive, including its underlying mechanisms, ultimately hindering the development of a cure. Interdisciplinary approaches are required to overcome long-established research challenges. This review summarizes current knowledge in various tinnitus-relevant research fields including tinnitus generating mechanisms, heterogeneity, epidemiology, assessment, and treatment development, in an effort to highlight the main challenges and provide suggestions for future research to overcome them. Four common themes across different areas were identified as future research direction: (1) Further establishment of multicenter and multidisciplinary collaborations; (2) Systematic reviews and syntheses of existing knowledge; (3) Standardization of research methods including tinnitus assessment, data acquisition, and data analysis protocols; (4) The design of studies with large sample sizes and the creation of large tinnitus-specific databases that would allow in-depth exploration of tinnitus heterogeneity.

Indexed as

big dataheterogeneityinterdisciplinary collaborationsreviewstandardizationtinnitustreatment development

Identifiers

PMID34177549
PMCPMC8225955
OpenAlexW3169500264

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.