Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34181640›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Estimating pulse wave velocity from the radial pressure wave using machine learning algorithms.

Weiwei Jin, Philip Chowienczyk, Jordi Alastruey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [A multi-source information fusion-based method for the local pulse wave velocity estimation in carotid artery].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Noninvasive hemodynamic indices of vascular aging: an in silico assessment.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Weiwei JinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0919-2470
Philip ChowienczykDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, St. Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jordi AlastrueyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3742-5259
King's College London · GBSechenov University · RUSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/15/104/31913British Heart Foundation SP/12/4/29573Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the European gold standard measurement of vascular ageing, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), which requires an experienced operator to measure pulse waves at two sites. In this work, two machine learning pipelines were proposed to estimate cfPWV from the peripheral pulse wave measured at a single site, the radial pressure wave measured by applanation tonometry. The study populations were the Twins UK cohort containing 3,082 subjects aged from 18 to 110 years, and a database containing 4,374 virtual subjects aged from 25 to 75 years. The first pipeline uses Gaussian process regression to estimate cfPWV from features extracted from the radial pressure wave using pulse wave analysis. The mean difference and upper and lower limits of agreement (LOA) of the estimation on the 924 hold-out test subjects from the Twins UK cohort were 0.2 m/s, and 3.75 m/s & -3.34 m/s, respectively. The second pipeline uses a recurrent neural network (RNN) to estimate cfPWV from the entire radial pressure wave. The mean difference and upper and lower LOA of the estimation on the 924 hold-out test subjects from the Twins UK cohort were 0.05 m/s, and 3.21 m/s & -3.11m/s, respectively. The percentage error of the RNN estimates on the virtual subjects increased by less than 2% when adding 20% of random noise to the pressure waveform. These results show the possibility of assessing the vascular ageing using a single peripheral pulse wave (e.g. the radial pressure wave), instead of cfPWV. The proposed code for the machine learning pipelines is available from the following online depository (https://github.com/WeiweiJin/Estimate-Cardiovascular-Risk-from-Pulse-Wave-Signal).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlgorithmsBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesCarotid ArteriesCarotid-Femoral Pulse Wave VelocityFemaleFemoral ArteryHeart RateHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPulse Wave AnalysisRadial Artery

Identifiers

PMID34181640
PMCPMC8238176
OpenAlexW3176459384

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.