ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2021
Number of steps and systolic blood pressure: Do work and leisure matter?
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association between number of steps and the ambulatory blood pressure during leisure vs. work hours among cleaners.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2023Article
- Association of Physical Activity and Quality of Life with Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in the UAE Young Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Number of steps and systolic blood pressure: Do work and leisure matter?Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The number of steps per day influences blood pressure and health. However, the association between steps at work and leisure and blood pressure is unknown. Thus, we aimed to investigate the association between the domain-specific number of steps and systolic blood pressure. A thigh-worn accelerometer was used to measure the steps of 694 workers over 1-5 consecutive days, separated into work and leisure domains using a self-reported diary. We linearly regressed steps at work, leisure and total day against systolic blood pressure, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, and antihypertensive medication. Additionally, we stratified the analyses on job type (blue-collar or white-collar). The results of this cross-sectional analysis indicated a beneficial association between the number of steps (per 2000-step interval) and systolic blood pressure for the total day (-0.5 mmHg; -1.0 to -0.8, 95% CI, p < 0.05) and work (-0.9 mmHg; -1.5 to -0.4, 95% CI, p < 0.05), but not for leisure (+0.1 mmHg; -0.7 to 0.9, 95% CI, p = 0.75). Blue-collar workers took almost twice as many steps at work (9143 ± SD3837) as white-collar workers (5863 ± SD3565) and, after stratification on job type, we observed a beneficial association between the number of steps at work and systolic blood pressure among blue-collar workers (-1.1 mmHg; -1.7 to -0.4, 95% CI, p < 0.05), but not for white-collar workers (-0.3 mmHg; -1.7 to 1.1, 95% CI, p = 0.7). These findings indicate that the number of steps at work, particularly among blue-collar workers, is beneficially associated with systolic blood pressure. Such findings support the potential of work (re)design to promote walking to improve blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.