Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34184997›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2021

Digital Self-Management Support Tools in the Care Plan of Patients With Cancer: Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Danielle Jm Adriaans, Angelique Tm Dierick-van Daele, Marc Johannes Hubertus Maria van Bakel, Grard Ap Nieuwenhuijzen, Joep Aw Teijink, Fanny Fbm Heesakkers, Hanneke Wm van Laarhoven

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Taking care of myself in a different and broken world: self-care practices of adolescents on dialysis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The cancer patients' perspective on feasibility of using a fatigue diary and the benefits on self-management: results from a longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  20. A multi-criteria decision model for assessing health and self-care ability.Central European journal of operations research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danielle Jm AdriaansDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4596-9080
Angelique Tm Dierick-van DaeleFontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6225-2233
Marc Johannes Hubertus Maria van BakelFontys School of People and Health Studies, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6782-9740
Grard Ap NieuwenhuijzenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5837-5513
Joep Aw TeijinkDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7927-6904
Fanny Fbm HeesakkersDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2584-4229
Hanneke Wm van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3546-9709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital self-management support tools (DSMSTs)-electronic devices or monitoring systems to monitor or improve health status-have become increasingly important in cancer care.

objectiveThe aim of this review is to analyze published randomized clinical trials to assess the effectiveness of DSMSTs on physical and psychosocial symptoms or other supportive care needs in adult patients with cancer.

methodsFive databases were searched from January 2013 to January 2020. English or Dutch language randomized controlled trials comparing DSMSTs with no intervention, usual care, alternative interventions, or a combination and including patients aged ≥18 years with pathologically proven cancer in the active treatment or survivorship phases were included. The results were summarized qualitatively.

resultsA total of 19 publications describing 3 types of DSMSTs were included. Although the content, duration, and frequency of interventions varied considerably across studies, the commonly used elements included an assessment component, tailored symptom self-management support, an information section, a communication section, and a diary. Significant positive effects were observed on quality of life in 6 (out of 10) studies, on anxiety in 1 (out of 5) study and depression in 2 (out of 8) studies, on symptom distress in 5 (out of 7) studies, on physical activity in 4 (out of 6) studies, on dietary behavior in 1 (out of 4) study, and on fatigue in 2 (out of 5) studies. Moreover, significant negative effects were observed on anxiety in 1 (out of 5) study and depression in 1 (out of 8) study. Most interventions were web-based interventions; 2 studies used mobile apps, and 1 study used a game as a DSMST. The overall quality of the studies was found to be good, with 13 out of 19 studies classified as high quality.

conclusionsThis review suggests that DSMSTs have a beneficial effect on the quality of life. For effects on other patient outcomes (eg, anxiety and depression, symptom distress, physical activity, dietary behavior, and fatigue), the evidence is inconsistent and limited or no effect is suggested. Future research should focus on specific tumor types, study different types of interventions separately, and assess the effects of specific interventions at different stages of disease progression.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSelf-ManagementAdolescentAdultAnxietyHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiccancer patientschronic patient groupsdigital healthdigital self-management support toolehealthmhealthmobile phonereviewweb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID34184997
PMCPMC8278296

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.