ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2021
Digital Self-Management Support Tools in the Care Plan of Patients With Cancer: Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Essential Components of an Electronic Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring and Management System: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Digital Therapeutic (Mika) Targeting Distress in Patients With Cancer: Results From a Nationwide Waitlist Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Trial
- Nurses' Experiences With Remote Paediatric Patient Asthma Care to Inform Enhanced Implementation: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- A Randomized Controlled Trial: eHealth Interventions for Self-Management and Psychological Coping in Cancer Patients.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identification of Barriers to Digital Patient Portal Adoption Among Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Curative Radiotherapy at a Canadian Provincial Cancer Program: A Quality Improvement Study.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Observational
- Integrating digital solutions improves mental health management in cancer care.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Revised: Exploring the experiences and perceived impact of using digital health technologies on individualised care among breast cancer survivors in the first year after primary treatment for breast cancer: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Empowering Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review on Gamified Approaches To Health Literacy for Self-Care.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Early Acute Kidney Injury and Its Association With Survival in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Front-Line Immunotherapy-Based Therapies.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Nutrition in cancer patients: analysis of the forum of women´s self-help association against cancer.BMC nutrition · 2025Article
- Digital support and artificial intelligence in cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy: patient utilization, acceptance and attitudes.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Supportive Digital Health Service During Cancer Chemotherapy: Single-Arm Before-and-After Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Taking care of myself in a different and broken world: self-care practices of adolescents on dialysis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Parent and clinician perceptions and recommendations on a pediatric cancer pain management app: A qualitative co-design study.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Article
- Usefulness of a Digitally Assisted Person-Centered Care Intervention: Qualitative Study of Patients' and Nurses' Experiences in a Long-term Perspective.JMIR nursing · 2023Article
- Article
- The cancer patients' perspective on feasibility of using a fatigue diary and the benefits on self-management: results from a longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- A multi-criteria decision model for assessing health and self-care ability.Central European journal of operations research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital self-management support tools (DSMSTs)-electronic devices or monitoring systems to monitor or improve health status-have become increasingly important in cancer care.
objectiveThe aim of this review is to analyze published randomized clinical trials to assess the effectiveness of DSMSTs on physical and psychosocial symptoms or other supportive care needs in adult patients with cancer.
methodsFive databases were searched from January 2013 to January 2020. English or Dutch language randomized controlled trials comparing DSMSTs with no intervention, usual care, alternative interventions, or a combination and including patients aged ≥18 years with pathologically proven cancer in the active treatment or survivorship phases were included. The results were summarized qualitatively.
resultsA total of 19 publications describing 3 types of DSMSTs were included. Although the content, duration, and frequency of interventions varied considerably across studies, the commonly used elements included an assessment component, tailored symptom self-management support, an information section, a communication section, and a diary. Significant positive effects were observed on quality of life in 6 (out of 10) studies, on anxiety in 1 (out of 5) study and depression in 2 (out of 8) studies, on symptom distress in 5 (out of 7) studies, on physical activity in 4 (out of 6) studies, on dietary behavior in 1 (out of 4) study, and on fatigue in 2 (out of 5) studies. Moreover, significant negative effects were observed on anxiety in 1 (out of 5) study and depression in 1 (out of 8) study. Most interventions were web-based interventions; 2 studies used mobile apps, and 1 study used a game as a DSMST. The overall quality of the studies was found to be good, with 13 out of 19 studies classified as high quality.
conclusionsThis review suggests that DSMSTs have a beneficial effect on the quality of life. For effects on other patient outcomes (eg, anxiety and depression, symptom distress, physical activity, dietary behavior, and fatigue), the evidence is inconsistent and limited or no effect is suggested. Future research should focus on specific tumor types, study different types of interventions separately, and assess the effects of specific interventions at different stages of disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.