Evidence mapPaperPMID 34195023Full record

ReviewJournal of traditional and complementary medicine2021

Konrad A Szychowski, Bartosz Skóra, Tadeusz Pomianek, Jan Gmiński

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nutrients · 2026
    Review
  2. Green Extraction and Liposomal Encapsulation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Bioactivity of mycosynthesized nanoparticles assists photothermal therapy of breast cancer cells.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Evaluation of Aqueous Extracts fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Elucidating the Anti-Diabetic Mechanisms of Mushroom Chaga (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Natural Products and Health Care Functions ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Comparative Study of Chaga (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Mushroom as Prebiotics: a Sustainable Approach for Healthcare.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Konrad A SzychowskiDepartment of Lifestyle Disorders and Regenerative Medicine, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225, Rzeszow, Poland.
Bartosz SkóraDepartment of Lifestyle Disorders and Regenerative Medicine, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225, Rzeszow, Poland.
Tadeusz PomianekDepartment of Management, Faculty of Administration and Social Sciences, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225, Rzeszow, Poland.
Jan GmińskiDepartment of Lifestyle Disorders and Regenerative Medicine, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225, Rzeszow, Poland.
University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The

Indexed as

Anti-CancerAnti-inflammationAnti-virusInonotus obliquusMushroom

Identifiers

PMID34195023
PMCPMC8240111
OpenAlexW3080100925

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.