Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34196013›Full record

ArticleResearch in nursing & health2021

Verifying intervention fidelity procedures for a palliative home care intervention with pilot study results.

Ubolrat Piamjariyakul, Angel Smothers, Stephanie Young, Elizabeth Morrissey, Trisha Petitte, Sijin Wen, Rafia Zulfikar, Rahul Sangani, Saima Shafique, Carol E Smith and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in nursing & health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ubolrat PiamjariyakulSchool of Nursing, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0310-3673
Angel SmothersSchool of Nursing, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Stephanie YoungSchool of Nursing, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Elizabeth MorrisseySchool of Nursing, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Trisha PetitteSchool of Nursing, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Sijin WenDepartment of Biostatistics School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Rafia ZulfikarSection of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Rahul SanganiSection of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Saima ShafiqueDepartment of Epidemiology School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Carol E SmithSchool of Nursing, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Kelly BosakSchool of Nursing, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
West Virginia University · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sijin Wen · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fidelity (consistency of intervention implementation) is essential to rigorous research. Intervention fidelity maintains study internal validity, intervention reproducibility, and transparency in the research conduct. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe intervention fidelity strategies/procedures developed for a pilot study testing a new palliative care nursing intervention (FamPALcare) for families managing advanced lung disease. The procedures described herein are based on the fidelity best practices recommendations from the NIH Consortium. An evidence-based checklist guided observational ratings of the fidelity procedures used and the intervention content implemented in each intervention session. Descriptive data on how participants understood (received), enacted, or used the intervention information were summarized. The fidelity checklist observational scores found ≥93% of the planned intervention content was implemented, and the fidelity strategies were adhered to consistently during each intervention session. The small variation (7%) in implementation was expected and related to participants' varying experiences, input, and/or questions. The helpfulness scale items include participants' ability to use home care resources, to anticipate and manage end-of-life symptoms, and to use Advance Directive forms. The high ratings (M = 4.4) on the 1-5 (very helpful) Likert Helpfulness Scale verified participants utilized the information from the intervention. Furthermore, there was an improvement in patients' breathlessness scores and completion of Advance Directive forms at 3 months after baseline. It is essential to plan intervention fidelity strategies to use throughout a study and to report fidelity results.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChecklistFemaleGuidelines as TopicHome Care ServicesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNursing ResearchPalliative CarePilot ProjectsQuality of Health CareReproducibility of Resultsintervention fidelitypalliative home carepilot studyrural Appalachia

Identifiers

PMID34196013
PMCPMC8440457
OpenAlexW3175676801

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.