ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2021
PET Imaging of Post-infarct Myocardial Inflammation.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lipoprotein(a) and oxidized phospholipids are associated with myocardial inflammation after acute myocardial infarction.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Trial
- An innovative hybrid imaging protocol for whole-bodyCardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Application of Radionuclide Myocardial Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of In-Hospital PCSK9 Inhibition on Myocardial Inflammation After Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2025Article
- Coronary Microvascular Disease Early After Myocardial Infarction: Diagnostic Approach and Prognostic Value-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Nuclear Methods for Immune Cell Imaging: Bridging Molecular Imaging and Individualized Medicine.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- PET Tracers for Imaging Cardiac Function in Cardio-oncology.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo examine the use of positron emission tomography (PET) for imaging post-infarct myocardial inflammation and repair. RECENT
findingsDysregulated immune responses after myocardial infarction are associated with adverse cardiac remodelling and an increased likelihood of ischaemic heart failure. PET imaging utilising novel tracers can be applied to visualise different components of the post-infarction inflammatory and repair processes. This approach could offer unique pathophysiological insights that could prove useful for the identification and risk-stratification of individuals who would ultimately benefit most from emerging immune-modulating therapies. PET imaging could also bridge the clinical translational gap as a surrogate measure of drug efficacy in early-stage clinical trials in patients with myocardial infarction. The use of hybrid PET/MR imaging, in particular, offers the additional advantage of simultaneous in vivo molecular imaging and detailed assessment of myocardial function, viability and tissue characterisation. Further research is needed to realise the true clinical translational value of PET imaging after myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.