Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34210261›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

Primary care implementation study to scale up early identification and brief intervention and reduce alcohol-related negative outcomes at the community level (PINO): study protocol for a quasi-experimental 3-arm study.

Bram Pussig, Lodewijk Pas, Ann Li, Mieke Vermandere, Bert Aertgeerts, Catharina Matheï

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04398576 (Primary Care Implementation Study to Scale up Early Identification and Brief Interventions and Reduce Alcohol Related Negative Outcomes at Community Level), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04398576 naunknown statusnot on this map

Primary Care Implementation Study to Scale up Early Identification and Brief Interventions and Reduce Alcohol Related Negative Outcomes at Community Level (PINO): Study Protocol for a Quasi-experimental 3-arm Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2020 to 2022Enrolled84ConditionsHarmful, Use, Alcohol, Hazardous, Use, AlcoholArmsTraining and support, Community actions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bram PussigAcademic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001, Leuven, KU, Belgium. bram.pussig@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1332-1017
Lodewijk PasAcademic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001, Leuven, KU, Belgium.
Ann LiAcademic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001, Leuven, KU, Belgium.
Mieke VermandereAcademic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001, Leuven, KU, Belgium.
Bert AertgeertsAcademic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001, Leuven, KU, Belgium.
Catharina MatheïAcademic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001, Leuven, KU, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary healthcare-based Early Identification and Brief Intervention (EIBI) for hazardous and harmful alcohol use is both a clinically relevant and cost-effective strategy to reduce heavy drinking. Unfortunately, it remains poorly implemented in daily practice. Multiple studies have shown that training and support (T&S) programs can increase the use of EIBI. Nonetheless, gains have only been modest and short-term at best. Suggestions have been made to rely more on multicomponent programs that simultaneously address several barriers to the implementation of EIBI. The PINO-project aims to evaluate the added value of such a multicomponent program to improve EIBI delivery in daily practice. METHODS/

designA quasi-experimental three-arm implementation study in Flanders (Belgium) will assess the effects of tailored T&S to General Practitioners (GPs) with or without community mobilisation on EIBI delivery in general practice. The study lasts 18 months and will take place in three comparable municipalities. In municipality 1 and 2, GPs receive a tailored T&S program. The T&S is theoretically founded and tailored to the GPs' views, needs and practice characteristics. Furthermore, community actions will be embedded within municipality 1 providing additional, contextual, support. In municipality 3, GPs are offered a minimal intervention to facilitate data collection. The primary outcome is the proportion of adult patients screened for hazardous and harmful alcohol use at the end of an 18-month implementation period. The secondary outcome is the scaling up activity at municipal level in screening rates, as assessed every 3 months, and the proportion of patients who received an additional brief intervention when necessary. Furthermore, the correlation between the opinions and needs of the GP's, their practice organisation and their EIBI performance will be explored. DISCUSSION: The PINO-project addresses the gap between what is theoretically possible and the current practice. This is an innovative study combining T&S at GP level with community actions. At the same time, it implements and evaluates practice T&S based on the theoretical domains framework.

trial registrationThis trial was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research of UZ/KU Leuven (reference number s63342 and G-2020-2177-R2(MAR)) and is registered on clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT04398576 ) in May 2020.

Indexed as

AlcoholismGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersAdultCrisis InterventionHumansNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicPrimary Health CareCommunity actionEIBIHarmful use of alcoholHazardous alcohol useHeavy drinkingImplementationPrimary healthcareScaling-upTraining and support

Identifiers

PMID34210261
PMCPMC8248288

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.