Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34211188›Full record

SynthesisNature methods2021

Meta-analysis defines principles for the design and analysis of co-fractionation mass spectrometry experiments.

Michael A Skinnider, Leonard J Foster

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael A SkinniderMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-1621
Leonard J FosterMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. foster@msl.ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-4817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-fractionation mass spectrometry (CF-MS) has emerged as a powerful technique for interactome mapping. However, there is little consensus on optimal strategies for the design of CF-MS experiments or their computational analysis. Here, we reanalyzed a total of 206 CF-MS experiments to generate a uniformly processed resource containing over 11 million measurements of protein abundance. We used this resource to benchmark experimental designs for CF-MS studies and systematically optimize computational approaches to network inference. We then applied this optimized methodology to reconstruct a draft-quality human interactome by CF-MS and predict over 700,000 protein-protein interactions across 27 eukaryotic species or clades. Our work defines new resources to illuminate proteome organization over evolutionary timescales and establishes best practices for the design and analysis of CF-MS studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionChemical FractionationDatabases, ProteinHumansMass SpectrometryMicePlasmodium bergheiProtein Interaction MappingProteomeProteomicsProteome

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.