ReviewIntensive care medicine experimental2021
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: research priorities for the administration, epidemiology, scoring and identification of sepsis.
Review in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decades of intensive care medicine trials: what randomised evidence has changed, corrected, and still questions to resolve.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- A case study of patient and public involvement in sepsis genomics research.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Blood Biomarker and Raman Analysis of Leukocytes in the Multicenter Intelligence Trials: At the Intensive Care Unit (Intelligence-1) and the Emergency Department (Intelligence-2).Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- A program to improve sepsis management in the Emergency Department: a multicenter prospective study in France.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Enhanced mortality prediction in pediatric sepsis using NGAL: A comparison with PRISM III scores in critical care settings.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Developing a rapid screening tool for high-risk ICU patients of sepsis: integrating electronic medical records with machine learning methods for mortality prediction in hospitalized patients-model establishment, internal and external validation, and visualization.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- In response to bacteria, neutrophils release extracellular vesicles capable of initiating thrombin generation through DNA-dependent and independent pathways.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2024Article
- Functional dependence following intensive care unit-treated sepsis: three-year follow-up results from the prospective Mid-German Sepsis Cohort (MSC).The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Article
- Platelet Indices in Patients With Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Sepsis: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Blood calprotectin as a biomarker for infection and sepsis - the prospective CASCADE trial.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Observational
- Article
- Continuous monitoring of physiological data using the patient vital status fusion score in septic critical care patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Predictors of Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Applying Sepsis Six Guidelines Among Critical Care Nurses.Cureus · 2024Article
- Decrease in Mortality after the Implementation of a Hospital Model to Improve Performance in Sepsis Care: Princess Sepsis Code.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Albumin versus balanced crystalloid for resuscitation in the treatment of sepsis: A protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study, "ABC-Sepsis".Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2023Article
- Development of a mobile application for health education about sepsis.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2023Article
- Exploring the risk factors of early sepsis after liver transplantation: development of a novel predictive model.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Micro- and nanosensors for detecting blood pathogens and biomarkers at different points of sepsis care.Mikrochimica acta · 2022Review
- Critical Care Database Comprising Patients With Infection.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify priorities for administrative, epidemiologic and diagnostic research in sepsis.
designAs a follow-up to a previous consensus statement about sepsis research, members of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Committee, representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine addressed six questions regarding care delivery, epidemiology, organ dysfunction, screening, identification of septic shock, and information that can predict outcomes in sepsis.
methodsSix questions from the Scoring/Identification and Administration sections of the original Research Priorities publication were explored in greater detail to better examine the knowledge gaps and rationales for questions that were previously identified through a consensus process.
resultsThe document provides a framework for priorities in research to address the following questions: (1) What is the optimal model of delivering sepsis care?; (2) What is the epidemiology of sepsis susceptibility and response to treatment?; (3) What information identifies organ dysfunction?; (4) How can we screen for sepsis in various settings?; (5) How do we identify septic shock?; and (6) What in-hospital clinical information is associated with important outcomes in patients with sepsis?
conclusionsThere is substantial knowledge of sepsis epidemiology and ways to identify and treat sepsis patients, but many gaps remain. Areas of uncertainty identified in this manuscript can help prioritize initiatives to improve an understanding of individual patient and demographic heterogeneity with sepsis and septic shock, biomarkers and accurate patient identification, organ dysfunction, and ways to improve sepsis care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.