Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34212466›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2021

Dementia in people with severe or profound intellectual (and multiple) disabilities: Focus group research into relevance, symptoms and training needs.

Alain D Dekker, Maureen B G Wissing, Aurora M Ulgiati, Bas Bijl, Gaby van Gool, Marieke R Groen, Esther S Grootendorst, Ina A van der Wal, Johannes S M Hobbelen, Peter P De Deyn and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Daily Stress and Cortisol Patterns in Midlife and Older Parents of Children With Developmental Disabilities.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alain D DekkerDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8771-218X
Maureen B G WissingDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3371-4547
Aurora M UlgiatiDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6393-946X
Bas BijlAdvisium, 's Heeren Loo, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Gaby van GoolIpse de Bruggen, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.
Marieke R GroenAdvisium, 's Heeren Loo, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Esther S GrootendorstIpse de Bruggen, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.
Ina A van der WalDepartment of Practice-Oriented Scientific Research (PWO), Alliade Care Group, Heerenveen, The Netherlands.
Johannes S M HobbelenResearch Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1852-0955
Peter P De DeynDepartment of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2228-2964
Aly WaningeResearch Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2316-2577
University Medical Center Groningen · NL's Heeren Loo · NLIpse de Bruggen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferentiating dementia from baseline level of functioning is difficult among people with severe/profound intellectual (and multiple) disabilities. Moreover, studies on observable dementia symptoms are scarce. This study examined (a) the relevance of dementia diagnosis, (b) observable symptoms and (c) training/information needs.

methodsFour explorative focus groups were held with care professionals and family members who have experience with people with severe/profound intellectual (and multiple) disabilities (≥40 years) and decline/dementia.

resultsThematic analysis showed that participants wanted to know about a dementia diagnosis for a better understanding and to be able to make informed choices (question 1). Using a categorisation matrix, cognitive and behavioural changes were shown to be most prominent (question 2). Participants indicated that they needed enhanced training, more knowledge development and translation, and supportive organisational choices/policies (question 3).

conclusionsTimely identifying/diagnosing dementia allows for a timely response to changing needs. This requires a better understanding of symptoms.

Indexed as

DementiaIntellectual DisabilityPersons with DisabilitiesFamilyFocus GroupsHumansdementiaDown syndromefocus groupsintellectual disabilitiessevere or profound intellectual (and multiple) disabilities

Identifiers

PMID34212466
PMCPMC8597061
OpenAlexW3175285095

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.