Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34223314›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2020

Cardiac arrest: An interdisciplinary scoping review of the literature from 2019.

Travis W Murphy, Scott A Cohen, K Leslie Avery, Meenakshi P Balakrishnan, Ramani Balu, Muhammad Abdul Baker Chowdhury, David B Crabb, Karl W Huesgen, Charles W Hwang, Carolina B Maciel and 4 more

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Cardiac arrest: An interdisciplinary scoping review of clinical literature from 2020.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Travis W MurphyDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Scott A CohenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
K Leslie AveryDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Meenakshi P BalakrishnanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ramani BaluDivision of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Muhammad Abdul Baker ChowdhuryDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David B CrabbDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Karl W HuesgenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Charles W HwangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Carolina B MacielDivision of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sarah S GulDepartment of Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Francis HanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Torben K BeckerDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Interdisciplinary Cardiac Arrest Research Review (ICARE) group

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Interdisciplinary Cardiac Arrest Research Review (ICARE) group was formed in 2018 to conduct a systematic annual search of peer-reviewed literature relevant to cardiac arrest. Now in its second year, the goals of the review are to illustrate best practices in research and help reduce compartmentalization of knowledge by disseminating clinically relevant advances in the field of cardiac arrest across disciplines.

methodsAn electronic search of PubMed using keywords related to cardiac arrest was conducted. Title and abstracts retrieved by these searches were screened for relevance, classified by article type (original research or review), and sorted into 7 categories. Screened manuscripts underwent standardized scoring of overall methodological quality and impact on the categorized fields of study by reviewer teams lead by a subject-matter expert editor. Articles scoring higher than 99 percentiles by category-type were selected for full critique. Systematic differences between editors' and reviewers' scores were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

resultsA total of 3348 articles were identified on initial search; of these, 1364 were scored after screening for relevance and deduplication, and forty-five underwent full critique. Epidemiology & Public Health represented 24% of fully reviewed articles with Prehospital Resuscitation, Technology & Care, and In-Hospital Resuscitation & Post-Arrest Care Categories both representing 20% of fully reviewed articles. There were no significant differences between editor and reviewer scoring.

conclusionsThe sheer number of articles screened is a testament to the need for an accessible source calling attention to high-quality and impactful research and serving as a high-yield reference for clinicians and scientists seeking to follow the ever-growing body of cardiac arrest-related literature. This will promote further development of the unique and interdisciplinary field of cardiac arrest medicine.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary resuscitationEmergency medical servicesEpidemiologyHeart arrestOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestSudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID34223314
PMCPMC8244427

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.