Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34227249›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2021

Reasons for undergoing amyloid imaging among cognitively unimpaired older adults.

Mary M Ryan, Daniel L Gillen, Joshua D Grill

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reasons for undergoing amyloid imaging among diverse enrollees in the A4 study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Views and Perceptions of Amyloid Imaging in a Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Trial.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary M RyanInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9137-1549
Daniel L GillenInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Joshua D GrillInstitute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
The Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at the University of California, IrvineP30AG066519 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Craig E Stark · 2020 to 2026
$27.9M
Effects of Alzheimers Disease Clinical Trial Study Partners-Diversity SupplementRF1AG059407 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GILLEN, DANIEL L, GRILL, JOSHUA · 2018 to 2019
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066519NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPreclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials screen cognitively unimpaired older adults for biomarker criteria and disclose their results. We examined whether participants in the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's disease Study with "elevated" and "not elevated" amyloid differed in scores on the "Views and Perceptions of Amyloid Imaging" questionnaire. We hypothesized that, prior to disclosure, those with elevated amyloid would score higher than those with not elevated amyloid. We also quantified how responses changed after result disclosure.

methodsWe assessed data from 4327 individuals who completed the questionnaire at screening visit 1 and after amyloid disclosure. We used linear regression models to assess the relationship between questionnaire category scores and amyloid status. We also quantified the relationship between category score changes and amyloid status.

resultsOverall, participants scored altruism and contribution to research as the strongest motivations for undergoing amyloid imaging. Those with elevated amyloid scored 0.23 points higher in the Perceived Risk category, on average, than those who had not elevated amyloid prior to disclosure; this effect attenuated towards zero after adjusting for Cognitive Function Instrument score. After disclosure, participants with elevated amyloid demonstrated less within-subject change in Perceived Risk, on average, compared to those with similar pre-disclosure scores who had not elevated amyloid, while demonstrating greater changes in the altruism and planning categories.

interpretationAltruism and learning disease risk motivated enrollment in this preclinical AD trial. Participants with elevated amyloid differed from their not elevated counterparts in their perceptions of amyloid imaging, even before undergoing the procedure.

Indexed as

AltruismHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePositron-Emission TomographyAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleAmyloid beta-Peptides

Identifiers

PMID34227249
PMCPMC8351390
OpenAlexW3178958573

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.